H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Byron Black vs Marc Rosset H2H: 1-2
Marc Rosset holds a 2–1 lead over Byron Black in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Marc Rosset leads 2–0 on clay, while Byron Black leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Marc Rosset won the 2000 Roland Garros first round 7-5 7-5 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ZIM
Age 56
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
SUI
Age 55
Right-Handed
201 cm / 6'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 31, 2000* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Marc Rosset | 7-5 7-5 6-0 | Byron Black | Match data |
| May 18, 2000* | Hamburg Masters | Masters 1000 | R32 | Clay | Marc Rosset | 6-3 6-2 | Byron Black | Match data |
| Nov 8, 1996* | Moscow | ATP 250 | R16 | Carpet | Byron Black | 7-6(3) 5-7 6-2 | Marc Rosset | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Byron Black | #876 | #22 | 1,283 | 1,870 | 239 | 229 | 51.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Marc Rosset | #1,490 | #9 | 2,069 | 1,950 | 398 | 334 | 54.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 14 | 14 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Byron Black | Marc Rosset | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #474 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 7–2 | 77.8% | #45 | 1,613 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 35–23 | 60.3% | #22 | 1,811 | 0 | 2 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 18–28 | 39.1% | #60 | 1,648 | 0 | 2 |
| 21 | 1991 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #123 | 1,521 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 31–22 | 58.5% | #35 | 1,826 | 0 | 3 |
| 22 | 1992 | 10–18 | 35.7% | #142 | 1,544 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 46–21 | 68.7% | #16 | 1,922 | 0 | 6 |
| 23 | 1993 | 19–20 | 48.7% | #84 | 1,662 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 46–27 | 63.0% | #14 | 1,925 | 0 | 8 |
| 24 | 1994 | 22–26 | 45.8% | #66 | 1,732 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 38–21 | 64.4% | #15 | 1,814 | 0 | 10 |
| 25 | 1995 | 28–24 | 53.8% | #40 | 1,832 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 31–27 | 53.4% | #22 | 1,771 | 0 | 10 |
| 26 | 1996 | 34–26 | 56.7% | #44 | 1,747 | 0 | 1 | 1997 | 32–31 | 50.8% | #31 | 1,630 | 0 | 11 |
| 27 | 1997 | 27–24 | 52.9% | #76 | 1,724 | 0 | 1 | 1998 | 27–27 | 50.0% | #31 | 1,749 | 0 | 11 |
| 28 | 1998 | 37–25 | 59.7% | #28 | 1,738 | 0 | 1 | 1999 | 26–27 | 49.1% | #45 | 1,658 | 0 | 12 |
| 29 | 1999 | 24–23 | 51.1% | #65 | 1,690 | 0 | 2 | 2000 | 31–25 | 55.4% | #28 | 1,723 | 0 | 14 |
| 30 | 2000 | 27–24 | 52.9% | #35 | 1,697 | 0 | 2 | 2001 | 12–23 | 34.3% | #119 | 1,601 | 0 | 14 |
| 31 | 2001 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #196 | 1,647 | 0 | 2 | 2002 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #101 | 1,597 | 0 | 14 |
| 32 | 2002 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #317 | 1,634 | 0 | 2 | 2003 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #122 | 1,586 | 0 | 14 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #214 | 1,546 | 0 | 14 |