H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 07:16 UTC
Byron Black vs Max Mirnyi H2H: 1-1
Byron Black and Max Mirnyi are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Byron Black leads 1–0 on carpet, while Max Mirnyi leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Max Mirnyi won the 1999 Shanghai third round 6-3 2-6 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ZIM
Age 56
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
BLR
Age 49
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 7, 1999* | Shanghai | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Max Mirnyi | 6-3 2-6 6-4 | Byron Black | Match data |
| Mar 6, 1999* | Copenhagen | ATP 250 | QF | Carpet | Byron Black | 6-7(5) 6-3 6-3 | Max Mirnyi | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Byron Black | #876 | #22 | 1,283 | 1,870 | 239 | 229 | 51.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Max Mirnyi | #1,155 | #18 | 1,320 | 1,913 | 216 | 222 | 49.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Byron Black | Max Mirnyi | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #314 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #340 | 1,443 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #274 | 1,443 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1991 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #123 | 1,521 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 14–13 | 51.9% | #74 | 1,613 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1992 | 10–18 | 35.7% | #142 | 1,544 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 27–25 | 51.9% | #40 | 1,716 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1993 | 19–20 | 48.7% | #84 | 1,662 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 29–26 | 52.7% | #35 | 1,865 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1994 | 22–26 | 45.8% | #66 | 1,732 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 24–27 | 47.1% | #43 | 1,717 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1995 | 28–24 | 53.8% | #40 | 1,832 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 37–28 | 56.9% | #23 | 1,785 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1996 | 34–26 | 56.7% | #44 | 1,747 | 0 | 1 | 2004 | 20–25 | 44.4% | #47 | 1,719 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 1997 | 27–24 | 52.9% | #76 | 1,724 | 0 | 1 | 2005 | 32–24 | 57.1% | #34 | 1,735 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 1998 | 37–25 | 59.7% | #28 | 1,738 | 0 | 1 | 2006 | 21–24 | 46.7% | #59 | 1,723 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 1999 | 24–23 | 51.1% | #65 | 1,690 | 0 | 2 | 2007 | 9–18 | 33.3% | #152 | 1,593 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 2000 | 27–24 | 52.9% | #35 | 1,697 | 0 | 2 | 2008 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #523 | 1,563 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | 2001 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #196 | 1,647 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2002 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #317 | 1,634 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |