H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Byron Black vs Pat Cash H2H: 2-0
Byron Black holds a 2–0 lead over Pat Cash in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Byron Black leads 1–0 on grass and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Byron Black won the 1997 Wimbledon first round 3-6 7-6(3) 6-4 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ZIM
Age 56
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
AUS
Age 61
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 25, 1997* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Byron Black | 3-6 7-6(3) 6-4 6-4 | Pat Cash | Match data |
| Aug 14, 1996* | New Haven | ATP 250 | R64 | Hard | Byron Black | 7-6(5) 6-4 | Pat Cash | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Byron Black | #876 | #22 | 1,283 | 1,870 | 239 | 229 | 51.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Pat Cash | #734 | #4 | 658 | 2,098 | 210 | 134 | 61.0% | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 6 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Byron Black | Pat Cash | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 2–5 | 28.6% | — | 1,496 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 17–10 | 63.0% | #63 | 1,697 | 0 | 1 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1983 | 26–17 | 60.5% | #34 | 1,829 | 0 | 2 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1984 | 26–15 | 63.4% | #10 | 1,905 | 0 | 2 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 11–7 | 61.1% | #67 | 1,833 | 0 | 2 |
| 21 | 1991 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #123 | 1,521 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 16–10 | 61.5% | #24 | 1,878 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 1992 | 10–18 | 35.7% | #142 | 1,544 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 41–15 | 73.2% | #7 | 2,022 | 1 | 5 |
| 23 | 1993 | 19–20 | 48.7% | #84 | 1,662 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 23–9 | 71.9% | #20 | 1,949 | 1 | 5 |
| 24 | 1994 | 22–26 | 45.8% | #66 | 1,732 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 4–2 | 66.7% | #368 | 1,927 | 1 | 5 |
| 25 | 1995 | 28–24 | 53.8% | #40 | 1,832 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 18–10 | 64.3% | #81 | 1,872 | 1 | 6 |
| 26 | 1996 | 34–26 | 56.7% | #44 | 1,747 | 0 | 1 | 1991 | 14–11 | 56.0% | #108 | 1,806 | 1 | 6 |
| 27 | 1997 | 27–24 | 52.9% | #76 | 1,724 | 0 | 1 | 1992 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #203 | 1,817 | 1 | 6 |
| 28 | 1998 | 37–25 | 59.7% | #28 | 1,738 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1999 | 24–23 | 51.1% | #65 | 1,690 | 0 | 2 | 1994 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #511 | 1,767 | 1 | 6 |
| 30 | 2000 | 27–24 | 52.9% | #35 | 1,697 | 0 | 2 | 1995 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #250 | 1,677 | 1 | 6 |
| 31 | 2001 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #196 | 1,647 | 0 | 2 | 1996 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #765 | 1,616 | 1 | 6 |
| 32 | 2002 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #317 | 1,634 | 0 | 2 | 1997 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #379 | 1,574 | 1 | 6 |