H2H data updated: 2026-07-14 14:15 UTC
Byron Black vs T. Ho H2H: 1-0
Byron Black holds a 1–0 lead over T. Ho in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Byron Black leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Byron Black won the 1995 Nottingham quarterfinal 6-3 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ZIM
Age 56
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
USA
Age 53
Left-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 24, 1995* | Nottingham | ATP 250 | QF | Grass | Byron Black | 6-3 6-4 | T. Ho | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Byron Black | #876 | #22 | 1,283 | 1,870 | 239 | 229 | 51.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| T. Ho | #1,306 | #85 | 522 | 1,622 | 36 | 66 | 35.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Byron Black | T. Ho | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #625 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #641 | 1,444 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #182 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #224 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #154 | 1,560 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #132 | 1,552 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1991 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #123 | 1,521 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 2–10 | 16.7% | #165 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1992 | 10–18 | 35.7% | #142 | 1,544 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 14–16 | 46.7% | #127 | 1,562 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1993 | 19–20 | 48.7% | #84 | 1,662 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #482 | 1,557 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1994 | 22–26 | 45.8% | #66 | 1,732 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #250 | 1,561 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1995 | 28–24 | 53.8% | #40 | 1,832 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1256 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1996 | 34–26 | 56.7% | #44 | 1,747 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1997 | 27–24 | 52.9% | #76 | 1,724 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1998 | 37–25 | 59.7% | #28 | 1,738 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1999 | 24–23 | 51.1% | #65 | 1,690 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2000 | 27–24 | 52.9% | #35 | 1,697 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2001 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #196 | 1,647 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2002 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #317 | 1,634 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |