H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Byron Black vs Vincent Spadea H2H: 3-1
Byron Black holds a 3–1 lead over Vincent Spadea in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Byron Black leads 3–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Byron Black won the 1999 Adelaide third round 1-6 7-6(6) 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ZIM
Age 56
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
3
–
1
4 main draw meetings
USA
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 7, 1999* | Adelaide | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Byron Black | 1-6 7-6(6) 6-2 | Vincent Spadea | Match data |
| Sep 2, 1998* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Byron Black | 6-4 6-1 6-2 | Vincent Spadea | Match data |
| Mar 14, 1995* | Miami Masters | Masters 1000 | R128 | Hard | Vincent Spadea | 6-1 6-3 | Byron Black | Match data |
| Jul 21, 1993* | Washington | ATP 250 | R64 | Hard | Byron Black | 6-3 6-3 | Vincent Spadea | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Byron Black | #876 | #22 | 1,283 | 1,870 | 239 | 229 | 51.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Vincent Spadea | #1,474 | #18 | 1,629 | 1,876 | 310 | 348 | 47.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Byron Black | Vincent Spadea | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1991 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #123 | 1,521 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #303 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 |
| 1992 | 10–18 | 35.7% | #142 | 1,544 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #75 | 1,561 | 0 | 0 |
| 1993 | 19–20 | 48.7% | #84 | 1,662 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 21–28 | 42.9% | #81 | 1,639 | 0 | 0 |
| 1994 | 22–26 | 45.8% | #66 | 1,732 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 27–22 | 55.1% | #54 | 1,711 | 0 | 0 |
| 1995 | 28–24 | 53.8% | #40 | 1,832 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 20–26 | 43.5% | #88 | 1,695 | 0 | 0 |
| 1996 | 34–26 | 56.7% | #44 | 1,747 | 0 | 1 | 1998 | 28–27 | 50.9% | #42 | 1,752 | 0 | 0 |
| 1997 | 27–24 | 52.9% | #76 | 1,724 | 0 | 1 | 1999 | 33–27 | 55.0% | #20 | 1,763 | 0 | 0 |
| 1998 | 37–25 | 59.7% | #28 | 1,738 | 0 | 1 | 2000 | 3–23 | 11.5% | #213 | 1,545 | 0 | 0 |
| 1999 | 24–23 | 51.1% | #65 | 1,690 | 0 | 2 | 2001 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #125 | 1,534 | 0 | 0 |
| 2000 | 27–24 | 52.9% | #35 | 1,697 | 0 | 2 | 2002 | 13–17 | 43.3% | #67 | 1,623 | 0 | 0 |
| 2001 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #196 | 1,647 | 0 | 2 | 2003 | 34–25 | 57.6% | #29 | 1,723 | 0 | 0 |
| 2002 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #317 | 1,634 | 0 | 2 | 2004 | 39–25 | 60.9% | #20 | 1,784 | 0 | 1 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 21–24 | 46.7% | #75 | 1,665 | 0 | 1 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 19–26 | 42.2% | #73 | 1,627 | 0 | 1 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 24–28 | 46.2% | #77 | 1,650 | 0 | 1 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 13–19 | 40.6% | #76 | 1,657 | 0 | 1 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #295 | 1,526 | 0 | 1 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1517 | 1,480 | 0 | 1 |