H2H data updated: 2026-09-03 00:00 UTC

Cameron Norrie vs Jeremy Chardy H2H: 2-0

Cameron Norrie holds a 2–0 lead over Jeremy Chardy in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Cameron Norrie leads 1–0 on grass and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Cameron Norrie won the 2019 Eastbourne Open first round 6-3 7-6(4).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Cameron Norrie
Great Britain Age 31 Left-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
2 – 0
2 main draw meetings
Jeremy Chardy
FRA Age 39 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Cameron Norrie #49 6-3 7-6(4) Jeremy Chardy #81 Match data Jun 26, 2019* R32 Eastbourne Open ATP 250 Grass
Cameron Norrie #73 5-7 6-4 6-4 Jeremy Chardy #43 Match data Jul 27, 2018* R16 Atlanta ATP 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Cameron Norrie #35 #8 3,550 2,071 248 186 57.1% 0 1 0 1 3 5
Jeremy Chardy #1,077 #25 1,486 1,967 293 304 49.1% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Cameron Norrie Jeremy Chardy
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 — — — — — — — 2006 2–2 50.0% #261 1,546 0 0
20 — — — — — — — 2007 0–3 0.0% #192 1,563 0 0
21 2017 2–4 33.3% #114 1,583 0 0 2008 10–9 52.6% #75 1,682 0 0
22 2018 17–16 51.5% #90 1,739 0 0 2009 34–28 54.8% #32 1,783 0 1
23 2019 21–25 45.7% #53 1,784 0 0 2010 24–28 46.2% #45 1,829 0 1
24 2020 7–11 38.9% #71 1,725 0 0 2011 8–18 30.8% #103 1,729 0 1
25 2021 50–24 67.6% #12 1,995 0 2 2012 24–20 54.5% #32 1,823 0 1
26 2022 48–21 69.6% #14 1,972 0 4 2013 22–25 46.8% #34 1,798 0 1
27 2023 31–22 58.5% #18 1,797 0 5 2014 33–27 55.0% #29 1,859 0 1
28 2024 20–18 52.6% #49 1,801 0 5 2015 27–27 50.0% #31 1,897 0 1
29 2025 32–26 55.2% #27 1,873 0 5 2016 17–21 44.7% #69 1,752 0 1
30 2026 20–19 51.3% #35 1,773 0 5 2017 17–21 44.7% #78 1,781 0 1
31 — — — — — — — 2018 24–21 53.3% #40 1,830 0 1
32 — — — — — — — 2019 28–27 50.9% #51 1,917 0 1
33 — — — — — — — 2020 2–5 28.6% #75 1,786 0 1
34 — — — — — — — 2021 20–18 52.6% #107 1,794 0 1
36 — — — — — — — 2023 1–4 20.0% #519 1,733 0 1

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Cameron Norrie Jeremy Chardy
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
21 2017 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 1 3 4 25.0% 2008 4 5 9 44.4% 5 3 8 62.5% 1 1 2 50.0%
22 2018 10 10 20 50.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 2 3 5 40.0% 2009 17 17 34 50.0% 15 8 23 65.2% 2 3 5 40.0%
23 2019 15 14 29 51.7% 4 8 12 33.3% 2 3 5 40.0% 2010 14 15 29 48.3% 8 10 18 44.4% 2 3 5 40.0%
24 2020 7 10 17 41.2% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2011 4 10 14 28.6% 4 6 10 40.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
25 2021 30 17 47 63.8% 14 5 19 73.7% 6 2 8 75.0% 2012 10 10 20 50.0% 12 8 20 60.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
26 2022 31 13 44 70.5% 11 5 16 68.8% 6 3 9 66.7% 2013 10 14 24 41.7% 8 9 17 47.1% 4 2 6 66.7%
27 2023 12 13 25 48.0% 16 7 23 69.6% 3 2 5 60.0% 2014 18 15 33 54.5% 10 9 19 52.6% 5 3 8 62.5%
28 2024 10 7 17 58.8% 8 8 16 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 2015 20 17 37 54.1% 7 8 15 46.7% 0 2 2 0.0%
29 2025 19 18 37 51.4% 9 5 14 64.3% 4 3 7 57.1% 2016 9 12 21 42.9% 7 7 14 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
30 2026 15 11 26 57.7% 5 6 11 45.5% 0 2 2 0.0% 2017 11 12 23 47.8% 4 5 9 44.4% 2 4 6 33.3%
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 13 15 28 46.4% 4 3 7 57.1% 7 3 10 70.0%
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 16 14 30 53.3% 10 10 20 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0%
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 2 4 6 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 15 9 24 62.5% 4 6 10 40.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
Career — 150 114 264 56.8% 72 48 120 60.0% 26 24 50 52.0% — 164 171 335 49.0% 100 99 199 50.3% 29 34 63 46.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 427/434 of Cameron Norrie's and 591/597 of Jeremy Chardy's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Cameron Norrie Jeremy Chardy
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
19 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2006 4/4 3.8 5.5 60.9% 63.7% 43.3% 46.2% 47.8% 55.6% 42.3%
20 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2007 3/3 7.7 3.0 57.6% 70.9% 47.9% 53.3% 32.6% 61.0% 31.3%
21 2017 6/6 4.2 4.0 58.1% 65.5% 51.4% 46.2% 29.1% 59.4% 32.0% 2008 19/19 10.2 5.2 62.0% 75.6% 51.4% 58.1% 39.3% 66.2% 32.6%
22 2018 33/33 4.7 3.4 64.9% 73.2% 50.5% 63.6% 43.4% 65.0% 37.3% 2009 62/62 8.6 3.3 58.9% 75.0% 53.0% 60.5% 39.4% 65.8% 34.5%
23 2019 46/46 4.6 3.4 66.0% 68.4% 48.8% 62.0% 39.8% 61.6% 34.9% 2010 52/52 8.3 3.5 57.7% 73.6% 49.1% 58.1% 38.6% 63.2% 35.9%
24 2020 18/18 5.9 4.7 64.9% 65.8% 51.4% 60.1% 46.6% 60.9% 35.3% 2011 26/26 6.7 4.3 57.2% 72.5% 44.6% 58.5% 37.2% 60.6% 33.1%
25 2021 74/74 4.7 2.7 65.9% 71.2% 50.2% 59.7% 50.9% 64.2% 40.5% 2012 44/44 7.4 4.1 56.7% 74.1% 50.2% 68.3% 39.9% 63.8% 37.0%
26 2022 68/69 4.6 2.0 65.5% 72.2% 52.5% 60.8% 47.9% 65.4% 39.9% 2013 47/47 8.3 5.2 60.9% 73.7% 49.2% 61.8% 37.3% 64.2% 34.8%
27 2023 53/53 4.8 2.3 64.7% 70.4% 53.1% 61.3% 42.7% 64.2% 38.3% 2014 60/60 8.5 4.0 58.9% 76.2% 51.5% 61.6% 40.3% 66.0% 35.5%
28 2024 37/38 5.4 2.4 64.4% 71.9% 52.5% 60.6% 44.6% 64.8% 36.9% 2015 54/54 7.5 4.3 62.0% 75.1% 52.9% 60.3% 39.9% 66.6% 35.6%
29 2025 53/58 5.1 2.5 65.1% 69.7% 50.6% 60.8% 39.8% 63.0% 36.1% 2016 38/38 8.1 5.1 59.0% 74.8% 49.8% 54.7% 45.4% 64.6% 37.8%
30 2026 39/39 4.7 3.0 63.0% 70.3% 51.5% 58.3% 40.6% 63.4% 36.9% 2017 37/38 7.8 4.3 63.2% 73.3% 48.9% 60.4% 37.1% 64.5% 36.1%
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2018 45/45 8.5 4.2 63.1% 75.8% 49.3% 59.0% 36.1% 66.0% 34.3%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2019 55/55 9.2 4.0 62.6% 73.6% 48.6% 63.4% 39.5% 64.3% 34.6%
33 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2020 7/7 8.0 5.7 60.7% 70.7% 43.6% 54.5% 24.6% 60.0% 34.3%
34 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2021 33/38 6.1 4.1 62.1% 69.6% 48.7% 53.1% 47.3% 61.6% 33.9%
36 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2023 5/5 3.0 8.2 63.6% 60.5% 38.6% 49.4% 54.0% 52.0% 30.9%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Cameron Norrie Jeremy Chardy
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 2013 1456 86.9 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2014 1464 101.8 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 1511 98.4 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 1547 109.6 -0.01 -0.38 0.953 48.3% — +18 — 54.5% +0.18 — 0–1 — -0.22
20 2016 1476 104.1 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1563 110.4 -0.05 -2.80 0.804 46.1% — — — 14.3% -1.71 0–1 1–3 (25%) — +0.03
21 2017 1584 114.2 -1.36 -0.54 0.788 45.9% — — -27 16.7% -2.58 — 1–0 — -0.28 2008 1682 127.9 +1.67 -2.03 0.965 49.3% -129 +32 — 45.6% +0.05 7–1 (88%) 5–12 (29%) — -0.36
22 2018 1740 138.9 +0.40 +1.11 1.066 51.3% -20 -112 -165 51.3% +0.16 3–7 (30%) 5–10 (33%) — +0.32 2009 1784 150.0 +2.44 -0.94 1.011 50.2% -58 +89 -176 51.0% +0.02 11–6 (65%) 17–14 (55%) — -2.59
23 2019 1785 143.7 -1.80 -0.86 0.909 48.5% +14 -163 -177 45.0% -0.36 6–7 (46%) 9–11 (45%) — +1.25 2010 1829 151.4 +0.53 +0.22 0.977 49.5% -15 -14 -202 46.7% -0.29 6–6 (50%) 14–9 (61%) — -2.43
24 2020 1726 130.4 -1.20 -0.17 0.903 48.5% +52 — — 43.4% -0.42 4–4 (50%) 1–6 (14%) — +1.16 2011 1730 130.1 -0.73 -3.31 0.842 47.4% +14 +22 — 34.4% -1.00 1–5 (17%) 5–6 (45%) — -0.53
25 2021 1996 165.7 +1.38 +3.85 1.130 52.4% -46 -91 -235 62.3% +0.92 13–9 (59%) 8–8 (50%) — -1.60 2012 1824 146.0 +0.74 -0.29 1.023 50.5% -35 -27 -210 52.8% +0.08 5–5 (50%) 10–9 (53%) — +1.81
26 2022 1972 158.7 +1.98 +3.69 1.153 52.4% +10 -30 -60 64.6% +0.87 17–7 (71%) 16–8 (67%) — +1.68 2013 1798 148.4 +0.56 -0.91 0.973 49.5% -1 -38 -80 48.4% -0.05 6–8 (43%) 12–9 (57%) — +2.11
27 2023 1798 150.8 +0.76 +1.68 1.070 51.2% +18 +182 +97 55.6% +0.51 12–8 (60%) 10–11 (48%) — +2.23 2014 1860 155.3 +2.21 +0.27 1.044 50.4% -17 -23 -33 52.6% +0.05 10–8 (56%) 20–20 (50%) — +0.64
28 2024 1802 147.5 +1.10 +0.79 1.049 50.9% +24 +92 +83 51.5% +0.37 8–5 (62%) 6–17 (26%) — +0.74 2015 1897 159.6 +2.09 +0.92 1.065 50.9% -10 -37 — 50.4% +0.06 7–10 (41%) 13–16 (45%) — -0.92
29 2025 1874 148.3 -0.86 +0.68 0.975 49.7% -52 +66 +32 52.2% +0.10 16–10 (62%) 22–17 (56%) — -1.61 2016 1753 145.0 +0.78 +1.08 1.065 50.9% -18 +104 +1 47.4% +0.14 4–6 (40%) 5–12 (29%) — +2.28
30 2026 1773 147.5 -0.16 +1.16 1.010 50.3% +50 +71 — 51.5% +0.10 8–7 (53%) 13–10 (57%) — +1.08 2017 1781 145.1 +0.66 +0.08 1.015 50.0% +8 +40 -55 42.2% -0.40 6–6 (50%) 7–7 (50%) — -1.26
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 1830 155.4 +2.05 -0.91 1.008 50.0% -17 +15 -13 49.6% +0.03 9–4 (69%) 12–9 (57%) — -1.20
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 1918 154.7 +0.56 -0.62 0.971 49.5% -20 -38 -152 49.0% +0.12 15–9 (63%) 14–26 (35%) — -2.48
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 1786 126.6 -0.59 -0.34 0.856 47.3% +42 — — 30.0% -1.05 1–1 0–1 — -1.08
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 1795 146.5 -0.75 -1.52 0.882 48.1% +76 -33 -95 46.9% -0.40 12–6 (67%) 15–8 (65%) — -2.92
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 1733 104.8 -3.39 -1.83 0.643 42.4% — — — 21.4% -2.21 — — — -0.32
Career — 2072 155.2 +0.39 +1.70 1.043 50.8% -2 +19 -65 54.6% +0.34 87–64 (58%) 91–98 (48%) 103.5 +1.15 — 1967 154.7 +1.06 -0.45 0.988 49.7% -13 +5 -91 47.8% -0.12 100–82 (55%) 150–162 (48%) 102.9 -1.59

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.