H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Camilo Ugo Carabelli vs Tomas Martin Etcheverry H2H: 1-2
Tomas Martin Etcheverry holds a 2–1 lead over Camilo Ugo Carabelli in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Tomas Martin Etcheverry leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Camilo Ugo Carabelli won the 2025 Rolex Paris Masters second round 7-5 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Argentina
Age 27
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
Argentina
Age 27
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 29, 2025* | Rolex Paris Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Hard | Camilo Ugo Carabelli | 7-5 6-3 | Tomas Martin Etcheverry | Match data |
| Aug 26, 2025* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Tomas Martin Etcheverry | 6-3 6-2 6-0 | Camilo Ugo Carabelli | Match data |
| May 22, 2025* | Bitpanda Hamburg Open | ATP 500 | R16 | Clay | Tomas Martin Etcheverry | 6-4 6-4 | Camilo Ugo Carabelli | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Camilo Ugo Carabelli | #58 | #43 | 1,133 | 1,720 | 37 | 50 | 42.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Tomas Martin Etcheverry | #30 | #25 | 1,660 | 1,887 | 104 | 115 | 47.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Camilo Ugo Carabelli | Tomas Martin Etcheverry | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #130 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 3–14 | 17.6% | #79 | 1,518 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2022 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #126 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 | 2023 | 29–27 | 51.8% | #30 | 1,771 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2023 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #141 | 1,541 | 0 | 0 | 2024 | 28–27 | 50.9% | #39 | 1,786 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2024 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #97 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 | 2025 | 22–28 | 44.0% | #59 | 1,750 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2025 | 19–25 | 43.2% | #49 | 1,643 | 0 | 0 | 2026 | 21–17 | 55.3% | #30 | 1,735 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2026 | 14–16 | 46.7% | #58 | 1,693 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |