H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Carlos Alcaraz vs Diego Schwartzman H2H: 1-0
Carlos Alcaraz holds a 1–0 lead over Diego Schwartzman in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Carlos Alcaraz leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Carlos Alcaraz won the 2022 Rio de Janeiro final 6-4 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Spain
Age 23
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
Argentina
Age 33
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 20, 2022* | Rio de Janeiro | ATP 500 | F | Clay | Carlos Alcaraz | 6-4 6-2 | Diego Schwartzman | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Carlos Alcaraz | #3 | #1 | 13,650 | 2,402 | 284 | 66 | 81.1% | 7 | 8 | 0 | 8 | 3 | 26 |
| Diego Schwartzman | #879 | #8 | 3,765 | 2,047 | 238 | 211 | 53.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Carlos Alcaraz | Diego Schwartzman | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2020 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #141 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2021 | 27–17 | 61.4% | #32 | 1,946 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2022 | 55–12 | 82.1% | #1 | 2,151 | 1 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2023 | 65–12 | 84.4% | #2 | 2,211 | 2 | 12 | 2013 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #117 | 1,588 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2024 | 44–12 | 78.6% | #3 | 2,178 | 4 | 16 | 2014 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #61 | 1,606 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2025 | 70–8 | 89.7% | #1 | 2,348 | 6 | 24 | 2015 | 11–20 | 35.5% | #88 | 1,720 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2026 | 22–4 | 84.6% | #3 | 2,339 | 7 | 26 | 2016 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #52 | 1,780 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 38–27 | 58.5% | #26 | 1,963 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 30–25 | 54.5% | #17 | 1,874 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 39–24 | 61.9% | #14 | 1,953 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 24–13 | 64.9% | #9 | 2,001 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 34–19 | 64.2% | #13 | 1,962 | 0 | 4 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 28–23 | 54.9% | #25 | 1,801 | 0 | 4 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 13–25 | 34.2% | #114 | 1,745 | 0 | 4 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 0–8 | 0.0% | #370 | 1,625 | 0 | 4 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #884 | 1,632 | 0 | 4 |