H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 19:16 UTC
Carlos Alcaraz vs Filip Krajinovic H2H: 2-0
Carlos Alcaraz holds a 2–0 lead over Filip Krajinovic in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Carlos Alcaraz leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Carlos Alcaraz won the 2022 Hamburg fourth round 7-6(4) 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Spain
Age 23
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
SRB
Age 34
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 22, 2022* | Hamburg | ATP 500 | R16 | Clay | Carlos Alcaraz | 7-6(4) 6-3 | Filip Krajinovic | Match data |
| Jul 24, 2021* | Umag | ATP 250 | QF | Clay | Carlos Alcaraz | 7-6(3) 2-6 6-1 | Filip Krajinovic | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Carlos Alcaraz | #3 | #1 | 13,650 | 2,402 | 284 | 66 | 81.1% | 7 | 8 | 0 | 8 | 3 | 26 |
| Filip Krajinovic | #1,204 | #26 | 1,724 | 1,984 | 115 | 125 | 47.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Carlos Alcaraz | Filip Krajinovic | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2020 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #141 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #352 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2021 | 27–17 | 61.4% | #32 | 1,946 | 0 | 1 | 2010 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #214 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2022 | 55–12 | 82.1% | #1 | 2,151 | 1 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2023 | 65–12 | 84.4% | #2 | 2,211 | 2 | 12 | 2012 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #420 | 1,541 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2024 | 44–12 | 78.6% | #3 | 2,178 | 4 | 16 | 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #226 | 1,584 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2025 | 70–8 | 89.7% | #1 | 2,348 | 6 | 24 | 2014 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #100 | 1,668 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2026 | 22–4 | 84.6% | #3 | 2,339 | 7 | 26 | 2015 | 3–11 | 21.4% | #101 | 1,675 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #234 | 1,660 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 6–2 | 75.0% | #34 | 1,807 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 14–17 | 45.2% | #94 | 1,768 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 27–17 | 61.4% | #40 | 1,902 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 16–12 | 57.1% | #31 | 1,870 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 20–22 | 47.6% | #42 | 1,761 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 17–16 | 51.5% | #54 | 1,830 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 3–12 | 20.0% | #311 | 1,675 | 0 | 0 |