H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Carlos Berlocq vs Daniel Gimeno-Traver H2H: 5-1

Carlos Berlocq holds a 5–1 lead over Daniel Gimeno-Traver in their ATP head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Carlos Berlocq leads 5–1 on clay. Most recently, Carlos Berlocq won the 2014 Estoril Open semifinal 7-6(6) 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Carlos Berlocq
ARG Age 43 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
5 – 1
6 main-draw meetings
Daniel Gimeno-Traver
ESP Age 41 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Carlos Berlocq #62 7-6(6) 6-2 Daniel Gimeno-Traver #98 Match data May 3, 2014* SF Estoril Open ATP 250 Clay
Carlos Berlocq #63 7-5 6-4 Daniel Gimeno-Traver #51 Match data Apr 24, 2013* R64 Barcelona Open ATP 500 Clay
Daniel Gimeno-Traver #54 6-3 6-2 Carlos Berlocq #75 Match data Feb 27, 2013* R32 Mexican Open ATP 500 Clay
Carlos Berlocq #55 7-5 6-0 Daniel Gimeno-Traver #104 Match data Feb 2, 2012* R32 Chile Open ATP 250 Clay
Carlos Berlocq #72 6-4 6-3 Daniel Gimeno-Traver #60 Match data Apr 28, 2011* R32 Estoril Open ATP 250 Clay
Carlos Berlocq #98 4-6 7-5 7-6(4) Daniel Gimeno-Traver #58 Match data Sep 23, 2010* R32 Tiriac Open ATP 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Carlos Berlocq #505 #37 1,086 1,853 127 187 40.4% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Daniel Gimeno-Traver #1,222 #48 998 1,809 95 169 36.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Carlos Berlocq Daniel Gimeno-Traver
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 — — — — — — — 2004 0–2 0.0% #180 1,481 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 2005 0–1 0.0% #192 1,503 0 0
20 — — — — — — — 2006 2–4 33.3% #267 1,505 0 0
22 2005 0–1 0.0% #79 1,454 0 0 2008 7–7 50.0% #90 1,631 0 0
23 2006 5–17 22.7% #132 1,428 0 0 2009 9–20 31.0% #72 1,641 0 0
24 2007 11–15 42.3% #85 1,551 0 0 2010 17–23 42.5% #56 1,733 0 0
25 2008 3–16 15.8% #157 1,450 0 0 2011 8–23 25.8% #107 1,644 0 0
26 — — — — — — — 2012 6–12 33.3% #70 1,620 0 0
27 2010 3–3 50.0% #66 1,542 0 0 2013 14–27 34.1% #77 1,576 0 0
28 2011 15–23 39.5% #60 1,657 0 0 2014 11–20 35.5% #112 1,627 0 0
29 2012 23–29 44.2% #66 1,656 0 0 2015 13–18 41.9% #98 1,611 0 0
30 2013 26–24 52.0% #41 1,827 0 1 2016 8–10 44.4% #115 1,686 0 0
31 2014 17–17 50.0% #72 1,743 0 2 2017 0–1 0.0% #366 1,632 0 0
32 2015 7–9 43.8% #111 1,693 0 2 2018 0–1 0.0% #189 1,613 0 0
33 2016 4–6 40.0% #95 1,734 0 2 — — — — — — —
34 2017 12–19 38.7% #112 1,694 0 2 — — — — — — —
35 2018 1–5 16.7% #139 1,667 0 2 — — — — — — —
36 2019 0–3 0.0% #507 1,505 0 2 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Carlos Berlocq Daniel Gimeno-Traver
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 — — — — 2 4 6 33.3% — — — —
22 2005 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2008 — — — — 7 7 14 50.0% — — — —
23 2006 1 3 4 25.0% 4 13 17 23.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 2009 0 4 4 0.0% 8 13 21 38.1% 1 3 4 25.0%
24 2007 0 4 4 0.0% 10 9 19 52.6% 1 2 3 33.3% 2010 6 10 16 37.5% 11 11 22 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
25 2008 0 4 4 0.0% 3 11 14 21.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 2011 0 7 7 0.0% 7 13 20 35.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 3 5 8 37.5% 3 7 10 30.0% — — — —
27 2010 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 2013 4 10 14 28.6% 10 14 24 41.7% 0 3 3 0.0%
28 2011 4 7 11 36.4% 10 14 24 41.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 2014 2 7 9 22.2% 9 10 19 47.4% 0 3 3 0.0%
29 2012 7 14 21 33.3% 15 11 26 57.7% 1 4 5 20.0% 2015 2 5 7 28.6% 11 10 21 52.4% 0 3 3 0.0%
30 2013 10 9 19 52.6% 15 12 27 55.6% 1 3 4 25.0% 2016 0 2 2 0.0% 8 8 16 50.0% — — — —
31 2014 1 7 8 12.5% 15 8 23 65.2% 1 2 3 33.3% 2017 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
32 2015 1 3 4 25.0% 6 6 12 50.0% — — — — 2018 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
33 2016 0 1 1 0.0% 4 5 9 44.4% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2017 3 3 6 50.0% 8 13 21 38.1% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2018 0 1 1 0.0% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2019 — — — — 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 27 57 84 32.1% 94 112 206 45.6% 6 18 24 25.0% — 17 50 67 25.4% 76 102 178 42.7% 2 17 19 10.5%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 307/314 of Carlos Berlocq's and 264/264 of Daniel Gimeno-Traver's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Carlos Berlocq Daniel Gimeno-Traver
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2004 2/2 5.5 6.0 54.4% 62.4% 53.3% 68.8% 100.0% 58.1% 21.2%
19 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2005 1/1 3.0 5.0 67.2% 56.1% 42.5% 52.6% 44.4% 51.6% 39.2%
20 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2006 6/6 3.3 1.8 57.2% 67.3% 41.5% 52.7% 33.1% 56.4% 33.5%
22 2005 1/1 1.0 4.0 59.5% 68.0% 29.4% 33.3% 0.0% 52.4% 30.8% 2008 14/14 4.1 1.7 62.5% 72.5% 58.4% 60.7% 45.1% 66.9% 38.4%
23 2006 22/22 2.2 3.0 59.9% 60.1% 45.1% 54.3% 54.5% 53.6% 38.5% 2009 29/29 3.2 2.9 64.0% 68.1% 45.1% 50.7% 37.3% 59.6% 34.4%
24 2007 23/26 3.7 1.7 61.9% 66.6% 50.1% 54.9% 40.9% 59.6% 34.5% 2010 40/40 5.8 3.0 58.7% 72.0% 52.8% 62.4% 30.9% 63.9% 33.4%
25 2008 19/19 3.3 2.3 61.7% 63.4% 43.1% 46.0% 40.2% 56.0% 37.5% 2011 31/31 4.6 2.9 56.0% 68.5% 46.3% 45.7% 36.1% 58.7% 35.7%
26 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2012 18/18 5.3 2.6 57.3% 68.6% 49.9% 53.6% 32.0% 60.5% 35.2%
27 2010 6/6 1.7 2.3 60.2% 63.2% 48.1% 56.2% 38.7% 57.2% 36.3% 2013 41/41 5.6 3.7 56.3% 71.1% 48.1% 58.1% 38.3% 60.9% 36.1%
28 2011 37/38 4.0 2.9 61.8% 67.3% 48.4% 51.3% 38.1% 59.9% 39.6% 2014 31/31 4.5 2.3 56.5% 69.9% 50.0% 51.7% 45.8% 61.3% 36.1%
29 2012 51/52 3.0 2.6 65.9% 65.3% 50.3% 53.2% 39.2% 59.9% 40.1% 2015 31/31 3.5 2.7 60.7% 70.2% 49.1% 50.0% 33.9% 61.7% 36.5%
30 2013 49/50 3.3 2.3 67.8% 70.4% 50.0% 55.5% 41.8% 63.7% 37.3% 2016 18/18 3.3 4.2 56.9% 67.3% 44.8% 53.3% 43.9% 57.6% 36.0%
31 2014 33/34 3.0 2.4 67.4% 66.7% 49.6% 60.6% 43.9% 61.1% 39.8% 2017 1/1 1.0 2.0 81.3% 53.8% 33.3% 50.0% — 50.0% 20.0%
32 2015 16/16 4.3 2.1 64.4% 68.4% 48.0% 56.4% 38.8% 61.0% 37.9% 2018 1/1 1.0 9.0 68.3% 61.0% 5.3% 53.8% 66.7% 43.3% 39.1%
33 2016 10/10 2.0 2.3 71.8% 60.9% 43.6% 56.0% 58.7% 56.5% 40.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
34 2017 31/31 2.9 2.9 61.3% 65.2% 49.6% 55.6% 46.2% 59.0% 37.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
35 2018 6/6 3.0 2.0 65.0% 64.3% 46.9% 47.6% 33.3% 58.5% 28.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
36 2019 3/3 2.3 1.7 56.6% 53.3% 46.2% 36.5% 30.5% 50.1% 37.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 307/314 3.2 2.5 64.3% 65.9% 48.5% 54.1% 42.3% 59.6% 38.1% — 264/264 4.5 3.0 58.7% 69.7% 48.7% 54.2% 37.8% 60.9% 35.4%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Carlos Berlocq Daniel Gimeno-Traver
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 1482 101.5 +0.02 -4.18 0.507 41.9% — — — 20.0% -2.00 0–1 1–1 — -0.14
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 1504 103.3 -2.38 -5.10 0.811 45.3% — — — 25.0% -2.50 — 1–0 — +0.30
20 2003 1478 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 1505 106.3 -1.22 -1.03 0.768 45.4% — +18 — 28.6% -1.21 2–0 0–2 — -0.11
21 2004 1465 97.7 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1519 102.1 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2005 1454 100.8 -2.29 -5.10 0.646 40.4% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — +0.19 2008 1631 128.1 +1.40 -0.10 1.161 52.0% — +43 — 51.5% +0.39 2–3 (40%) 2–5 (29%) 97.3 +0.20
23 2006 1428 113.9 -5.99 +0.03 0.831 46.6% +61 +41 — 30.6% -1.06 1–4 (20%) 3–4 (43%) 97.6 +0.77 2009 1642 132.0 -1.77 -1.98 0.851 47.2% -138 +74 -75 27.9% -1.10 4–3 (57%) 4–6 (40%) 101.0 -1.24
24 2007 1551 123.3 -2.82 -1.97 0.854 47.4% -83 +68 -87 44.3% -0.26 2–3 (40%) 5–7 (42%) 99.9 +1.33 2010 1733 140.5 +0.99 -2.01 0.927 48.4% -136 +88 — 43.3% -0.43 6–7 (46%) 7–11 (39%) 101.8 -1.95
25 2008 1451 116.8 -4.78 -0.93 0.851 46.7% -26 +71 — 26.1% -1.33 1–6 (14%) 3–5 (38%) 93.2 -0.25 2011 1644 128.2 -2.58 -1.56 0.865 47.0% -119 +119 -118 28.4% -1.45 3–7 (30%) 4–7 (36%) 95.4 -0.72
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 1621 127.1 -1.49 -2.10 0.892 48.0% -62 +56 — 34.1% -0.95 2–3 (40%) 3–4 (43%) 100.0 +0.11
27 2010 1542 116.3 -1.42 -0.42 0.848 46.7% — +85 — 42.9% -0.93 1–0 2–0 — +0.01 2013 1576 139.2 -1.50 -0.77 0.924 48.5% -58 +152 -118 41.1% -0.62 5–12 (29%) 7–11 (39%) 95.0 +0.22
28 2011 1658 141.7 -1.96 +1.98 0.989 49.4% -156 +1 -200 41.5% -0.36 5–10 (33%) 5–10 (33%) 97.6 -1.59 2014 1628 138.6 -1.23 +0.16 0.933 48.7% -95 +102 -208 39.5% -0.54 2–7 (22%) 3–8 (27%) 92.9 -0.44
29 2012 1657 148.5 -2.64 +2.36 1.001 50.1% -91 +97 -221 45.1% -0.02 8–6 (57%) 7–8 (47%) 103.8 +1.93 2015 1612 125.5 -1.66 -0.02 0.954 49.0% -140 +126 -207 40.5% -0.59 5–4 (56%) 6–9 (40%) 101.8 +0.04
30 2013 1827 157.9 +0.16 +1.05 1.028 50.1% -69 -10 -393 50.0% +0.15 8–8 (50%) 6–10 (38%) 99.6 -1.20 2016 1686 121.3 -3.34 -1.10 0.850 47.5% — +96 — 40.5% -1.00 4–4 (50%) 3–2 (60%) 100.6 +1.22
31 2014 1744 139.2 -1.96 +1.94 1.023 50.5% -88 +143 -297 48.1% -0.04 5–4 (56%) 6–4 (60%) 101.5 -0.42 2017 1632 93.9 -2.78 -4.11 0.400 35.5% — — — — — — — — -0.07
32 2015 1693 139.3 -0.88 +1.29 0.973 49.9% -34 +75 — 46.7% -0.53 3–5 (38%) 4–1 (80%) 100.5 -0.65 2018 1613 105.0 -4.25 -1.02 0.691 41.5% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — -0.05
33 2016 1735 126.6 -2.73 +1.14 0.930 49.0% — +95 — 36.4% -0.59 0–1 1–1 — -0.30 2019 1518 93.7 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2017 1695 138.3 -3.23 +0.60 0.906 48.3% -51 +53 -241 40.7% -0.74 5–8 (38%) 5–3 (63%) 100.0 -0.39 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2018 1667 119.0 -2.49 -0.73 0.689 44.3% — +27 — 20.0% -1.47 1–0 0–1 — -0.36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2019 1505 105.1 -3.42 -0.56 0.757 43.8% — +57 — 14.3% -2.43 0–1 0–1 — +0.25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1853 142.9 -2.37 +0.92 0.943 48.9% -77 +59 -245 42.0% -0.41 40–56 (42%) 47–55 (46%) 98.7 -0.22 — 1810 134.9 -1.24 -1.13 0.905 48.1% -103 +98 -139 37.7% -0.77 35–51 (41%) 41–66 (38%) 95.2 -1.00

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.