H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Carlos Berlocq vs Ruben Ramirez Hidalgo H2H: 0-1
Ruben Ramirez Hidalgo holds a 1–0 lead over Carlos Berlocq in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Ruben Ramirez Hidalgo leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Ruben Ramirez Hidalgo won the 2006 Amersfoort third round 6-7(4) 6-3 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ARG
Age 43
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
ESP
Age 48
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 20, 2006* | Amersfoort | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Ruben Ramirez Hidalgo | 6-7(4) 6-3 6-3 | Carlos Berlocq | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Carlos Berlocq | #505 | #37 | 1,086 | 1,853 | 127 | 186 | 40.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Ruben Ramirez Hidalgo | #1,153 | #50 | 826 | 1,704 | 68 | 133 | 33.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Carlos Berlocq | Ruben Ramirez Hidalgo | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 22 | 2005 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #79 | 1,454 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2006 | 5–17 | 22.7% | #132 | 1,427 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #154 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2007 | 11–15 | 42.3% | #85 | 1,550 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #141 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2008 | 3–16 | 15.8% | #157 | 1,450 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 5–11 | 31.2% | #80 | 1,477 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 7–19 | 26.9% | #130 | 1,448 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2010 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #66 | 1,541 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #120 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2011 | 15–23 | 39.5% | #60 | 1,672 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 25–20 | 55.6% | #57 | 1,665 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2012 | 23–28 | 45.1% | #66 | 1,670 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 9–18 | 33.3% | #133 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2013 | 26–24 | 52.0% | #41 | 1,829 | 0 | 1 | 2008 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #121 | 1,579 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2014 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #72 | 1,728 | 0 | 2 | 2009 | 4–10 | 28.6% | #156 | 1,586 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | 2015 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #111 | 1,686 | 0 | 2 | 2010 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #77 | 1,573 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | 2016 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #95 | 1,728 | 0 | 2 | 2011 | 5–15 | 25.0% | #130 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 |
| 34 | 2017 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #112 | 1,693 | 0 | 2 | 2012 | 3–12 | 20.0% | #91 | 1,572 | 0 | 0 |
| 35 | 2018 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #139 | 1,665 | 0 | 2 | 2013 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #166 | 1,568 | 0 | 0 |
| 36 | 2019 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #507 | 1,504 | 0 | 2 | 2014 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #224 | 1,620 | 0 | 0 |