H2H data updated: 2026-09-10 00:00 UTC

Carlos Berlocq vs Thiemo de Bakker H2H: 1-0

Carlos Berlocq holds a 1–0 lead over Thiemo de Bakker in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Carlos Berlocq leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Carlos Berlocq won the 2013 Swedish Open semifinal 7-5 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Carlos Berlocq
ARG Age 43 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Thiemo de Bakker
NED Age 37 Right-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Carlos Berlocq #74 7-5 6-3 Thiemo de Bakker #104 Match data Jul 13, 2013* SF Swedish Open ATP 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Carlos Berlocq #505 #37 1,086 1,853 127 187 40.4% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Thiemo de Bakker #1,382 #40 1,010 1,853 54 80 40.3% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Carlos Berlocq Thiemo de Bakker
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 — — — — — — — 2006 1–1 50.0% #464 1,512 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 2007 1–4 20.0% #444 1,502 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 2008 1–1 50.0% #249 1,531 0 0
20 — — — — — — — 2009 2–3 40.0% #96 1,612 0 0
21 — — — — — — — 2010 26–23 53.1% #43 1,763 0 0
22 2005 0–1 0.0% #79 1,454 0 0 2011 2–11 15.4% #223 1,665 0 0
23 2006 5–17 22.7% #132 1,428 0 0 2012 0–2 0.0% #124 1,642 0 0
24 2007 11–15 42.3% #85 1,551 0 0 2013 7–10 41.2% #146 1,683 0 0
25 2008 3–16 15.8% #157 1,450 0 0 2014 7–6 53.8% #144 1,665 0 0
26 — — — — — — — 2015 2–5 28.6% #99 1,617 0 0
27 2010 3–3 50.0% #66 1,542 0 0 2016 5–12 29.4% #257 1,582 0 0
28 2011 15–23 39.5% #60 1,657 0 0 — — — — — — —
29 2012 23–29 44.2% #66 1,656 0 0 2018 0–1 0.0% #242 1,558 0 0
30 2013 26–24 52.0% #41 1,827 0 1 2019 0–1 0.0% #511 1,536 0 0
31 2014 17–17 50.0% #72 1,743 0 2 — — — — — — —
32 2015 7–9 43.8% #111 1,693 0 2 — — — — — — —
33 2016 4–6 40.0% #95 1,734 0 2 — — — — — — —
34 2017 12–19 38.7% #112 1,694 0 2 — — — — — — —
35 2018 1–5 16.7% #139 1,667 0 2 — — — — — — —
36 2019 0–3 0.0% #507 1,505 0 2 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Carlos Berlocq Thiemo de Bakker
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 16 16 32 50.0% 7 4 11 63.6% 3 3 6 50.0%
22 2005 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2011 1 6 7 14.3% 1 5 6 16.7% — — — —
23 2006 1 3 4 25.0% 4 13 17 23.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 2012 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
24 2007 0 4 4 0.0% 10 9 19 52.6% 1 2 3 33.3% 2013 2 4 6 33.3% 4 3 7 57.1% 1 3 4 25.0%
25 2008 0 4 4 0.0% 3 11 14 21.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 2014 5 5 10 50.0% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7%
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 0 2 2 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — —
27 2010 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 2016 3 7 10 30.0% 2 5 7 28.6% — — — —
28 2011 4 7 11 36.4% 10 14 24 41.7% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2012 7 14 21 33.3% 15 11 26 57.7% 1 4 5 20.0% 2018 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
30 2013 10 9 19 52.6% 15 12 27 55.6% 1 3 4 25.0% 2019 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
31 2014 1 7 8 12.5% 15 8 23 65.2% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2015 1 3 4 25.0% 6 6 12 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2016 0 1 1 0.0% 4 5 9 44.4% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2017 3 3 6 50.0% 8 13 21 38.1% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2018 0 1 1 0.0% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2019 — — — — 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 27 57 84 32.1% 94 112 206 45.6% 6 18 24 25.0% — 27 45 72 37.5% 20 24 44 45.5% 7 11 18 38.9%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 307/314 of Carlos Berlocq's and 133/134 of Thiemo de Bakker's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Carlos Berlocq Thiemo de Bakker
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
17 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2006 2/2 3.5 3.0 54.6% 74.1% 49.1% 72.9% 41.7% 62.8% 39.2%
18 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2007 5/5 8.2 1.2 65.7% 71.8% 58.9% 57.1% 49.6% 67.3% 25.6%
19 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2008 2/2 7.5 1.0 55.0% 73.1% 56.3% 68.6% 31.3% 66.0% 34.0%
20 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2009 5/5 5.8 1.4 62.2% 70.1% 51.0% 61.2% 36.1% 62.1% 36.0%
21 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2010 49/49 9.8 1.6 61.0% 73.7% 53.5% 60.8% 41.7% 65.8% 35.9%
22 2005 1/1 1.0 4.0 59.5% 68.0% 29.4% 33.3% 0.0% 52.4% 30.8% 2011 13/13 6.5 2.8 54.5% 68.0% 48.7% 53.9% 21.4% 59.2% 28.0%
23 2006 22/22 2.2 3.0 59.9% 60.1% 45.1% 54.3% 54.5% 53.6% 38.5% 2012 2/2 5.0 1.0 55.3% 60.2% 42.0% 48.5% 100.0% 52.1% 28.9%
24 2007 23/26 3.7 1.7 61.9% 66.6% 50.1% 54.9% 40.9% 59.6% 34.5% 2013 17/17 6.2 2.0 60.6% 69.6% 45.6% 62.0% 41.5% 60.2% 34.7%
25 2008 19/19 3.3 2.3 61.7% 63.4% 43.1% 46.0% 40.2% 56.0% 37.5% 2014 12/13 8.7 2.2 57.1% 77.0% 47.1% 64.2% 26.3% 64.1% 33.6%
26 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2015 7/7 9.0 2.0 54.3% 74.6% 49.2% 59.1% 37.8% 63.0% 34.9%
27 2010 6/6 1.7 2.3 60.2% 63.2% 48.1% 56.2% 38.7% 57.2% 36.3% 2016 17/17 7.2 1.5 60.3% 70.5% 47.1% 49.0% 36.1% 61.3% 33.8%
28 2011 37/38 4.0 2.9 61.8% 67.3% 48.4% 51.3% 38.1% 59.9% 39.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
29 2012 51/52 3.0 2.6 65.9% 65.3% 50.3% 53.2% 39.2% 59.9% 40.1% 2018 1/1 4.0 3.0 71.7% 60.6% 15.4% 33.3% — 47.8% 15.8%
30 2013 49/50 3.3 2.3 67.8% 70.4% 50.0% 55.5% 41.8% 63.7% 37.3% 2019 1/1 9.0 4.0 58.2% 68.8% 17.4% 69.2% — 47.3% 21.4%
31 2014 33/34 3.0 2.4 67.4% 66.7% 49.6% 60.6% 43.9% 61.1% 39.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 2015 16/16 4.3 2.1 64.4% 68.4% 48.0% 56.4% 38.8% 61.0% 37.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 2016 10/10 2.0 2.3 71.8% 60.9% 43.6% 56.0% 58.7% 56.5% 40.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
34 2017 31/31 2.9 2.9 61.3% 65.2% 49.6% 55.6% 46.2% 59.0% 37.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
35 2018 6/6 3.0 2.0 65.0% 64.3% 46.9% 47.6% 33.3% 58.5% 28.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
36 2019 3/3 2.3 1.7 56.6% 53.3% 46.2% 36.5% 30.5% 50.1% 37.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 307/314 3.2 2.5 64.3% 65.9% 48.5% 54.1% 42.3% 59.6% 38.1% — 133/134 8.1 1.8 59.5% 72.0% 49.7% 58.8% 37.6% 63.0% 33.7%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Carlos Berlocq Thiemo de Bakker
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 1513 104.7 -0.21 +0.15 1.055 51.5% — — — 60.0% +0.20 0–1 — — -0.08
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1502 115.2 -0.81 -3.06 0.782 47.1% — — — 35.7% -0.79 0–2 4–3 (57%) — -0.08
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 1532 107.0 -0.17 -0.92 1.000 50.8% — — — 50.0% 0.00 — 0–1 — +0.11
20 2003 1478 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 1612 119.7 +1.05 -2.08 0.949 49.0% — — — 41.7% -0.58 1–1 2–2 (50%) — 0.00
21 2004 1465 97.7 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 1764 149.9 +1.79 +0.33 1.050 50.7% -70 +14 -122 50.8% +0.25 7–5 (58%) 11–16 (41%) 101.3 +0.27
22 2005 1454 100.8 -2.29 -5.10 0.646 40.4% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — +0.19 2011 1665 125.5 -1.60 -4.74 0.686 44.4% -43 +82 — 27.0% -1.97 2–4 (33%) 3–2 (60%) 100.3 -0.54
23 2006 1428 113.9 -5.99 +0.03 0.831 46.6% +61 +41 — 30.6% -1.06 1–4 (20%) 3–4 (43%) 97.6 +0.77 2012 1642 103.3 -3.01 -3.23 0.604 41.7% — — — 0.0% -3.25 — 0–1 — -0.03
24 2007 1551 123.3 -2.82 -1.97 0.854 47.4% -83 +68 -87 44.3% -0.26 2–3 (40%) 5–7 (42%) 99.9 +1.33 2013 1684 129.6 -1.39 -1.41 0.871 47.6% -45 +78 -77 37.8% -0.81 2–1 (67%) 3–2 (60%) 101.5 -0.74
25 2008 1451 116.8 -4.78 -0.93 0.851 46.7% -26 +71 — 26.1% -1.33 1–6 (14%) 3–5 (38%) 93.2 -0.25 2014 1665 127.0 +0.17 -1.17 0.935 48.9% +12 — — 48.1% -0.19 2–1 (67%) 4–2 (67%) 104.8 +0.61
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 1618 116.8 +1.14 -1.79 0.944 49.0% — +111 — 41.2% -0.17 2–3 (40%) 3–3 (50%) 98.8 +0.19
27 2010 1542 116.3 -1.42 -0.42 0.848 46.7% — +85 — 42.9% -0.93 1–0 2–0 — +0.01 2016 1583 124.7 -1.66 -1.23 0.874 47.5% +82 +70 — 34.9% -1.05 2–3 (40%) 3–4 (43%) 98.4 -0.71
28 2011 1658 141.7 -1.96 +1.98 0.989 49.4% -156 +1 -200 41.5% -0.36 5–10 (33%) 5–10 (33%) 97.6 -1.59 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2012 1657 148.5 -2.64 +2.36 1.001 50.1% -91 +97 -221 45.1% -0.02 8–6 (57%) 7–8 (47%) 103.8 +1.93 2018 1558 101.5 -1.76 -3.04 0.303 33.3% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — +0.06
30 2013 1827 157.9 +0.16 +1.05 1.028 50.1% -69 -10 -393 50.0% +0.15 8–8 (50%) 6–10 (38%) 99.6 -1.20 2019 1536 99.8 +0.16 -1.51 0.406 36.1% — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — -0.04
31 2014 1744 139.2 -1.96 +1.94 1.023 50.5% -88 +143 -297 48.1% -0.04 5–4 (56%) 6–4 (60%) 101.5 -0.42 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2015 1693 139.3 -0.88 +1.29 0.973 49.9% -34 +75 — 46.7% -0.53 3–5 (38%) 4–1 (80%) 100.5 -0.65 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2016 1735 126.6 -2.73 +1.14 0.930 49.0% — +95 — 36.4% -0.59 0–1 1–1 — -0.30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2017 1695 138.3 -3.23 +0.60 0.906 48.3% -51 +53 -241 40.7% -0.74 5–8 (38%) 5–3 (63%) 100.0 -0.39 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2018 1667 119.0 -2.49 -0.73 0.689 44.3% — +27 — 20.0% -1.47 1–0 0–1 — -0.36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2019 1505 105.1 -3.42 -0.56 0.757 43.8% — +57 — 14.3% -2.43 0–1 0–1 — +0.25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1853 142.9 -2.37 +0.92 0.943 48.9% -77 +59 -245 42.0% -0.41 40–56 (42%) 47–55 (46%) 98.7 -0.22 — 1854 134.5 +0.13 -1.17 0.910 48.5% -29 +62 -104 41.6% -0.54 18–21 (46%) 33–36 (48%) 101.5 -0.74

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.