H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Carlos Costa vs David Rikl H2H: 2-0
Carlos Costa holds a 2–0 lead over David Rikl in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Carlos Costa leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Carlos Costa won the 1996 Amsterdam third round 6-2 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 58
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
CZE
Age 55
Left-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 1, 1996* | Amsterdam | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Carlos Costa | 6-2 6-3 | David Rikl | Match data |
| Aug 5, 1993* | Prague | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Carlos Costa | 6-2 6-1 | David Rikl | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Carlos Costa | #1,297 | #10 | 1,663 | 1,960 | 237 | 201 | 54.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 |
| David Rikl | #852 | #41 | 809 | 1,685 | 53 | 92 | 36.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Carlos Costa | David Rikl | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #400 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #313 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1988 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #243 | 1,524 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #163 | 1,474 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1989 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #201 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #151 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1990 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #151 | 1,554 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #95 | 1,530 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1991 | 15–13 | 53.6% | #55 | 1,659 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 19–28 | 40.4% | #80 | 1,534 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1992 | 39–21 | 65.0% | #14 | 1,761 | 0 | 2 | 1995 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #83 | 1,533 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1993 | 42–23 | 64.6% | #26 | 1,872 | 0 | 4 | 1996 | 10–21 | 32.3% | #150 | 1,528 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1994 | 35–26 | 57.4% | #27 | 1,675 | 0 | 6 | 1997 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #173 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1995 | 29–22 | 56.9% | #31 | 1,756 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1996 | 25–24 | 51.0% | #61 | 1,659 | 0 | 6 | 1999 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #868 | 1,565 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 1997 | 20–23 | 46.5% | #56 | 1,629 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1998 | 21–24 | 46.7% | #67 | 1,570 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1999 | 1–10 | 9.1% | #472 | 1,474 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |