H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Carlos Costa vs Diego Nargiso H2H: 1-0
Carlos Costa holds a 1–0 lead over Diego Nargiso in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Carlos Costa leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Carlos Costa won the 1993 Rome Masters second round 3-6 6-2 7-6(5).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 58
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
ITA
Age 56
Left-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 12, 1993* | Rome Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Clay | Carlos Costa | 3-6 6-2 7-6(5) | Diego Nargiso | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Carlos Costa | #1,297 | #10 | 1,663 | 1,960 | 237 | 201 | 54.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 |
| Diego Nargiso | #1,400 | #67 | 531 | 1,702 | 94 | 152 | 38.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Carlos Costa | Diego Nargiso | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #191 | 1,511 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 10–12 | 45.5% | #90 | 1,621 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 11–19 | 36.7% | #150 | 1,590 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1988 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #243 | 1,524 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #147 | 1,618 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1989 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #201 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #109 | 1,603 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1990 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #151 | 1,554 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 19–22 | 46.3% | #88 | 1,596 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1991 | 15–13 | 53.6% | #55 | 1,659 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 8–23 | 25.8% | #120 | 1,525 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1992 | 39–21 | 65.0% | #14 | 1,761 | 0 | 2 | 1994 | 10–18 | 35.7% | #118 | 1,530 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1993 | 42–23 | 64.6% | #26 | 1,872 | 0 | 4 | 1995 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #183 | 1,528 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1994 | 35–26 | 57.4% | #27 | 1,675 | 0 | 6 | 1996 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #280 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1995 | 29–22 | 56.9% | #31 | 1,756 | 0 | 6 | 1997 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #152 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1996 | 25–24 | 51.0% | #61 | 1,659 | 0 | 6 | 1998 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #128 | 1,563 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 1997 | 20–23 | 46.5% | #56 | 1,629 | 0 | 6 | 1999 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #220 | 1,524 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 1998 | 21–24 | 46.7% | #67 | 1,570 | 0 | 6 | 2000 | 8–4 | 66.7% | #134 | 1,612 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 1999 | 1–10 | 9.1% | #472 | 1,474 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |