H2H data updated: 2026-07-20 02:15 UTC
Carlos Costa vs Gilad Bloom H2H: 0-1
Gilad Bloom holds a 1–0 lead over Carlos Costa in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Gilad Bloom leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Gilad Bloom won the 1994 St. Poelten fourth round 6-3 3-6 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 58
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
ISR
Age 59
Left-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 17, 1994* | St. Poelten | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Gilad Bloom | 6-3 3-6 7-5 | Carlos Costa | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Carlos Costa | #1,297 | #10 | 1,663 | 1,960 | 237 | 201 | 54.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 |
| Gilad Bloom | #1,295 | #61 | 524 | 1,750 | 82 | 103 | 44.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Carlos Costa | Gilad Bloom | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1984 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #385 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #452 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #152 | 1,538 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1988 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #243 | 1,524 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #139 | 1,547 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1989 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #201 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #210 | 1,562 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1990 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #151 | 1,554 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #105 | 1,577 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1991 | 15–13 | 53.6% | #55 | 1,659 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 25–21 | 54.3% | #66 | 1,735 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1992 | 39–21 | 65.0% | #14 | 1,761 | 0 | 2 | 1991 | 15–24 | 38.5% | #125 | 1,634 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1993 | 42–23 | 64.6% | #26 | 1,872 | 0 | 4 | 1992 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #137 | 1,656 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1994 | 35–26 | 57.4% | #27 | 1,675 | 0 | 6 | 1993 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #167 | 1,630 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1995 | 29–22 | 56.9% | #31 | 1,756 | 0 | 6 | 1994 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #217 | 1,618 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1996 | 25–24 | 51.0% | #61 | 1,659 | 0 | 6 | 1995 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #407 | 1,608 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 1997 | 20–23 | 46.5% | #56 | 1,629 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1998 | 21–24 | 46.7% | #67 | 1,570 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1999 | 1–10 | 9.1% | #472 | 1,474 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |