H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Casper Ruud vs Henri Laaksonen H2H: 2-0
Casper Ruud holds a 2–0 lead over Henri Laaksonen in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Casper Ruud leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Casper Ruud won the 2022 Miami Masters second round 6-1 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Norway
Age 27
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
SUI
Age 34
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 26, 2022* | Miami Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Hard | Casper Ruud | 6-1 6-2 | Henri Laaksonen | Match data |
| Jul 17, 2021* | Bastad | ATP 250 | QF | Clay | Casper Ruud | (w/o) | Henri Laaksonen | Match data |
| Jan 14, 2019 | Australian Open | Grand Slam | Q1 | Hard | Henri Laaksonen | 6-2 6-4 | Casper Ruud | Match data |
| Mar 8, 2018* | Indian Wells Masters | Masters 1000 | Q1 | Hard | Casper Ruud | 6-1 6-4 | Henri Laaksonen | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Casper Ruud | #13 | #2 | 5,850 | 2,128 | 285 | 160 | 64.0% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 12 | 14 |
| Henri Laaksonen | #1,622 | #84 | 798 | 1,830 | 37 | 64 | 36.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Casper Ruud | Henri Laaksonen | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2016 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #225 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2017 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #139 | 1,541 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2018 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #112 | 1,689 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2019 | 20–17 | 54.1% | #54 | 1,770 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #291 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2020 | 19–12 | 61.3% | #27 | 1,860 | 0 | 1 | 2013 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #244 | 1,600 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2021 | 53–18 | 74.6% | #8 | 2,050 | 0 | 6 | 2014 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #318 | 1,554 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2022 | 46–20 | 69.7% | #3 | 2,048 | 0 | 9 | 2015 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #181 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2023 | 35–22 | 61.4% | #11 | 1,891 | 0 | 10 | 2016 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #136 | 1,592 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2024 | 44–23 | 65.7% | #6 | 1,915 | 0 | 12 | 2017 | 10–10 | 50.0% | #121 | 1,691 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2025 | 34–17 | 66.7% | #12 | 1,917 | 0 | 14 | 2018 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #169 | 1,643 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2026 | 23–13 | 63.9% | #13 | 1,930 | 0 | 14 | 2019 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #104 | 1,655 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #134 | 1,660 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 7–8 | 46.7% | #98 | 1,790 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 3–14 | 17.6% | #172 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 |