H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Casper Ruud vs Rogerio Dutra Silva H2H: 1-0
Casper Ruud holds a 1–0 lead over Rogerio Dutra Silva in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Casper Ruud leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Casper Ruud won the 2017 Rio de Janeiro third round 6-3 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Norway
Age 27
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
BRA
Age 42
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 11, 2019 | Buenos Aires | ATP 250 | Q1 | Clay | Rogerio Dutra Silva | 6-2 3-6 6-4 | Casper Ruud | Match data |
| Feb 23, 2017* | Rio de Janeiro | ATP 500 | R32 | Clay | Casper Ruud | 6-3 6-4 | Rogerio Dutra Silva | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Casper Ruud | #13 | #2 | 5,850 | 2,128 | 285 | 160 | 64.0% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 12 | 14 |
| Rogerio Dutra Silva | #735 | #63 | 733 | 1,745 | 23 | 59 | 28.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Casper Ruud | Rogerio Dutra Silva | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2016 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #225 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2017 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #139 | 1,541 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2018 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #112 | 1,689 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2019 | 20–17 | 54.1% | #54 | 1,770 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2020 | 19–12 | 61.3% | #27 | 1,860 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2021 | 53–18 | 74.6% | #8 | 2,050 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2022 | 46–20 | 69.7% | #3 | 2,048 | 0 | 9 | 2007 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #306 | 1,450 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2023 | 35–22 | 61.4% | #11 | 1,891 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2024 | 44–23 | 65.7% | #6 | 1,915 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2025 | 34–17 | 66.7% | #12 | 1,917 | 0 | 14 | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #158 | 1,471 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2026 | 23–13 | 63.9% | #13 | 1,930 | 0 | 14 | 2011 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #124 | 1,557 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #126 | 1,642 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #132 | 1,645 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #283 | 1,618 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #125 | 1,681 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #98 | 1,593 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 10–21 | 32.3% | #101 | 1,604 | 0 | 0 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 5–11 | 31.2% | #159 | 1,707 | 0 | 0 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #236 | 1,637 | 0 | 0 |