H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Cecil Mamiit vs Daniel Nestor H2H: 0-1
Daniel Nestor holds a 1–0 lead over Cecil Mamiit in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Daniel Nestor leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Daniel Nestor won the 1999 Singapore third round 6-3 4-6 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
PHI
Age 50
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
CAN
Age 53
Left-Handed
191 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 14, 1999* | Singapore | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Daniel Nestor | 6-3 4-6 6-4 | Cecil Mamiit | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cecil Mamiit | #1,573 | #72 | 625 | 1,633 | 48 | 95 | 33.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Daniel Nestor | #1,106 | #58 | 752 | 1,737 | 69 | 101 | 40.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Cecil Mamiit | Daniel Nestor | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #823 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #242 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #238 | 1,468 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1996 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #200 | 1,471 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #189 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1997 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #229 | 1,441 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #171 | 1,556 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1998 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #130 | 1,432 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #177 | 1,589 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1999 | 16–18 | 47.1% | #93 | 1,552 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #112 | 1,653 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2000 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #121 | 1,538 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 9–17 | 34.6% | #107 | 1,596 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2001 | 10–18 | 35.7% | #111 | 1,557 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 11–17 | 39.3% | #106 | 1,597 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2002 | 8–14 | 36.4% | #111 | 1,556 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 18–16 | 52.9% | #86 | 1,672 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2003 | 3–15 | 16.7% | #183 | 1,434 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #220 | 1,599 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2004 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #226 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #219 | 1,649 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2005 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #209 | 1,469 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #659 | 1,621 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #500 | 1,623 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1062 | 1,612 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | 2008 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #462 | 1,469 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1115 | 1,606 | 0 | 0 |