H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC

Cedric Pioline vs Carlos Costa H2H: 3-0

Cedric Pioline holds a 3–0 lead over Carlos Costa in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Cedric Pioline leads 3–0 on clay. Most recently, Cedric Pioline won the 1998 Monte Carlo Masters second round 6-2 3-6 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Cedric Pioline
FRA Age 57 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
3 – 0
3 main draw meetings
Carlos Costa
ESP Age 58 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Apr 22, 1998* Monte Carlo Masters Masters 1000 R64 Clay Cedric Pioline #16 6-2 3-6 6-3 Carlos Costa #45 Match data
Apr 28, 1996* Monte Carlo Masters Masters 1000 QF Clay Cedric Pioline #29 6-2 6-3 Carlos Costa #33 Match data
Jul 23, 1992* Hilversum ATP 250 R32 Clay Cedric Pioline #66 6-3 6-3 Carlos Costa #10 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Cedric Pioline #750 #5 2,335 1,983 370 301 55.1% 0 1 0 0 4 5
Carlos Costa #1,297 #10 1,663 1,960 237 201 54.1% 0 0 0 0 6 6

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Cedric Pioline Carlos Costa
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
20 1989 0–3 0.0% #202 1,483 0 0 1988 2–2 50.0% #243 1,524 0 0
21 1990 5–12 29.4% #118 1,484 0 0 1989 2–5 28.6% #201 1,512 0 0
22 1991 21–20 51.2% #51 1,664 0 0 1990 6–8 42.9% #151 1,554 0 0
23 1992 31–27 53.4% #33 1,845 0 0 1991 15–13 53.6% #55 1,659 0 0
24 1993 51–27 65.4% #10 1,936 0 0 1992 39–21 65.0% #14 1,761 0 2
25 1994 29–28 50.9% #51 1,767 0 0 1993 42–23 64.6% #26 1,872 0 4
26 1995 24–27 47.1% #54 1,760 0 0 1994 35–26 57.4% #27 1,675 0 6
27 1996 38–21 64.4% #21 1,805 0 1 1995 29–22 56.9% #31 1,756 0 6
28 1997 37–25 59.7% #20 1,834 0 2 1996 25–24 51.0% #61 1,659 0 6
29 1998 38–26 59.4% #18 1,764 0 2 1997 20–23 46.5% #56 1,629 0 6
30 1999 37–28 56.9% #13 1,795 0 3 1998 21–24 46.7% #67 1,570 0 6
31 2000 32–19 62.7% #16 1,760 0 5 1999 1–10 9.1% #472 1,474 0 6
32 2001 17–22 43.6% #84 1,657 0 5 — — — — — — —
33 2002 10–16 38.5% #119 1,618 0 5 — — — — — — —