H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Cedric Pioline vs Marcelo Filippini H2H: 2-1

Cedric Pioline holds a 2–1 lead over Marcelo Filippini in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Cedric Pioline leads 2–1 on clay. Most recently, Cedric Pioline won the 1998 Roland Garros first round 6-1 3-6 7-5 6-7(4) 6-4.

FRA Age 57 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
2 1
3 main draw meetings
URU Age 58 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
May 27, 1998* Roland Garros Grand Slam R128 Clay Cedric Pioline #17 6-1 3-6 7-5 6-7(4) 6-4 Marcelo Filippini #102 Match data
Apr 17, 1997* Barcelona ATP 250 R32 Clay Cedric Pioline #34 6-2 6-4 Marcelo Filippini #78 Match data
Jul 22, 1993* Stuttgart Outdoor ATP 250 R32 Clay Marcelo Filippini #82 6-3 2-6 7-5 Cedric Pioline #15 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Cedric Pioline #750 #5 2,335 1,983 370 301 55.1% 0 1 0 0 4 5
Marcelo Filippini #967 #30 971 1,799 217 229 48.7% 0 0 0 0 5 5

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Cedric Pioline Marcelo Filippini
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 1987 3–4 42.9% #118 1,518 0 0
20 1989 0–3 0.0% #202 1,483 0 0 1988 25–17 59.5% #53 1,670 0 1
21 1990 5–12 29.4% #118 1,484 0 0 1989 27–18 60.0% #43 1,728 0 2
22 1991 21–20 51.2% #51 1,664 0 0 1990 24–22 52.2% #49 1,685 0 2
23 1992 31–27 53.4% #33 1,845 0 0 1991 9–21 30.0% #107 1,528 0 2
24 1993 51–27 65.4% #10 1,936 0 0 1992 25–21 54.3% #60 1,614 0 2
25 1994 29–28 50.9% #51 1,767 0 0 1993 17–26 39.5% #87 1,625 0 2
26 1995 24–27 47.1% #54 1,760 0 0 1994 22–15 59.5% #60 1,693 0 3
27 1996 38–21 64.4% #21 1,805 0 1 1995 15–20 42.9% #101 1,674 0 3
28 1997 37–25 59.7% #20 1,834 0 2 1996 13–14 48.1% #81 1,659 0 3
29 1998 38–26 59.4% #18 1,764 0 2 1997 26–21 55.3% #44 1,697 0 5
30 1999 37–28 56.9% #13 1,795 0 3 1998 5–16 23.8% #135 1,592 0 5
31 2000 32–19 62.7% #16 1,760 0 5 1999 6–12 33.3% #106 1,586 0 5
32 2001 17–22 43.6% #84 1,657 0 5 2000 0–2 0.0% #775 1,560 0 5
33 2002 10–16 38.5% #119 1,618 0 5