H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Cedric Pioline vs Marcelo Filippini H2H: 2-1
Cedric Pioline holds a 2–1 lead over Marcelo Filippini in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Cedric Pioline leads 2–1 on clay. Most recently, Cedric Pioline won the 1998 Roland Garros first round 6-1 3-6 7-5 6-7(4) 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 57
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
URU
Age 58
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 27, 1998* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Cedric Pioline | 6-1 3-6 7-5 6-7(4) 6-4 | Marcelo Filippini | Match data |
| Apr 17, 1997* | Barcelona | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Cedric Pioline | 6-2 6-4 | Marcelo Filippini | Match data |
| Jul 22, 1993* | Stuttgart Outdoor | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Marcelo Filippini | 6-3 2-6 7-5 | Cedric Pioline | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cedric Pioline | #750 | #5 | 2,335 | 1,983 | 370 | 301 | 55.1% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 5 |
| Marcelo Filippini | #967 | #30 | 971 | 1,799 | 217 | 229 | 48.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Cedric Pioline | Marcelo Filippini | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #118 | 1,518 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1989 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #202 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 25–17 | 59.5% | #53 | 1,670 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1990 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #118 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 27–18 | 60.0% | #43 | 1,728 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 1991 | 21–20 | 51.2% | #51 | 1,664 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 24–22 | 52.2% | #49 | 1,685 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 1992 | 31–27 | 53.4% | #33 | 1,845 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 9–21 | 30.0% | #107 | 1,528 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 1993 | 51–27 | 65.4% | #10 | 1,936 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 25–21 | 54.3% | #60 | 1,614 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 1994 | 29–28 | 50.9% | #51 | 1,767 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 17–26 | 39.5% | #87 | 1,625 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 1995 | 24–27 | 47.1% | #54 | 1,760 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 22–15 | 59.5% | #60 | 1,693 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 1996 | 38–21 | 64.4% | #21 | 1,805 | 0 | 1 | 1995 | 15–20 | 42.9% | #101 | 1,674 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 1997 | 37–25 | 59.7% | #20 | 1,834 | 0 | 2 | 1996 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #81 | 1,659 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 1998 | 38–26 | 59.4% | #18 | 1,764 | 0 | 2 | 1997 | 26–21 | 55.3% | #44 | 1,697 | 0 | 5 |
| 30 | 1999 | 37–28 | 56.9% | #13 | 1,795 | 0 | 3 | 1998 | 5–16 | 23.8% | #135 | 1,592 | 0 | 5 |
| 31 | 2000 | 32–19 | 62.7% | #16 | 1,760 | 0 | 5 | 1999 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #106 | 1,586 | 0 | 5 |
| 32 | 2001 | 17–22 | 43.6% | #84 | 1,657 | 0 | 5 | 2000 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #775 | 1,560 | 0 | 5 |
| 33 | 2002 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #119 | 1,618 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |