H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Cedrik-Marcel Stebe vs Albert Ramos-Vinolas H2H: 0-1

Albert Ramos-Vinolas holds a 1–0 lead over Cedrik-Marcel Stebe in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Albert Ramos-Vinolas leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Albert Ramos-Vinolas won the 2019 Swiss Open Gstaad final 6-3 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Cedrik-Marcel Stebe
Germany Age 35 Left-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main draw meetings
Albert Ramos-Vinolas
Spain Age 38 Left-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Albert Ramos-Vinolas #85 6-3 6-2 Cedrik-Marcel Stebe #455 Match data Jul 28, 2019* F Swiss Open Gstaad ATP 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Cedrik-Marcel Stebe #382 #71 688 1,756 29 49 37.2% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Albert Ramos-Vinolas #477 #17 2,180 1,967 276 328 45.7% 0 0 0 0 4 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Cedrik-Marcel Stebe Albert Ramos-Vinolas
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
20 2011 4–4 50.0% #81 1,656 0 0 — — — — — — —
21 2012 7–15 31.8% #177 1,649 0 0 — — — — — — —
22 2013 2–3 40.0% #167 1,654 0 0 2010 2–4 33.3% #123 1,554 0 0
23 — — — — — — — 2011 13–16 44.8% #66 1,722 0 0
24 — — — — — — — 2012 26–30 46.4% #50 1,729 0 0
25 2016 0–1 0.0% #470 1,619 0 0 2013 19–22 46.3% #83 1,646 0 0
26 2017 5–6 45.5% #82 1,725 0 0 2014 13–20 39.4% #63 1,726 0 0
27 2018 0–2 0.0% #507 1,684 0 0 2015 16–23 41.0% #54 1,768 0 0
28 2019 7–10 41.2% #165 1,716 0 0 2016 34–31 52.3% #27 1,884 0 1
29 2020 2–3 40.0% #126 1,679 0 0 2017 33–30 52.4% #23 1,814 0 1
30 2021 1–4 20.0% #227 1,553 0 0 2018 18–28 39.1% #65 1,700 0 1
31 2022 1–1 50.0% #203 1,557 0 0 2019 30–24 55.6% #41 1,854 0 2
32 — — — — — — — 2020 9–14 39.1% #46 1,704 0 2
33 — — — — — — — 2021 24–25 49.0% #45 1,730 0 3
34 — — — — — — — 2022 24–27 47.1% #39 1,741 0 4
35 — — — — — — — 2023 12–23 34.3% #89 1,644 0 4
36 — — — — — — — 2024 3–9 25.0% #165 1,563 0 4
37 — — — — — — — 2025 0–2 0.0% #403 1,565 0 4

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Cedrik-Marcel Stebe Albert Ramos-Vinolas
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
20 2011 — — — — 4 2 6 66.7% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2012 2 8 10 20.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2013 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 2010 0 1 1 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — —
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 2 6 8 25.0% 11 10 21 52.4% — — — —
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 10 15 25 40.0% 16 13 29 55.2% 0 2 2 0.0%
25 2016 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2013 4 8 12 33.3% 14 12 26 53.8% 1 2 3 33.3%
26 2017 2 3 5 40.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 2014 1 6 7 14.3% 12 14 26 46.2% — — — —
27 2018 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2015 7 8 15 46.7% 8 13 21 38.1% 1 2 3 33.3%
28 2019 3 5 8 37.5% 4 4 8 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2016 13 16 29 44.8% 19 13 32 59.4% 2 2 4 50.0%
29 2020 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — 2017 9 15 24 37.5% 22 13 35 62.9% 2 2 4 50.0%
30 2021 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2018 5 13 18 27.8% 13 14 27 48.1% 0 1 1 0.0%
31 2022 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2019 8 11 19 42.1% 22 12 34 64.7% 0 1 1 0.0%
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 2 5 7 28.6% 7 9 16 43.8% — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 5 11 16 31.3% 19 11 30 63.3% 0 3 3 0.0%
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 5 11 16 31.3% 19 14 33 57.6% 0 2 2 0.0%
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 1 7 8 12.5% 11 14 25 44.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2024 0 2 2 0.0% 3 7 10 30.0% — — — —
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2025 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
Career — 12 26 38 31.6% 15 16 31 48.4% 2 7 9 22.2% — 72 135 207 34.8% 198 174 372 53.2% 6 19 25 24.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 78/78 of Cedrik-Marcel Stebe's and 602/604 of Albert Ramos-Vinolas's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Cedrik-Marcel Stebe Albert Ramos-Vinolas
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
20 2011 8/8 2.9 3.4 56.2% 61.7% 43.9% 51.9% 47.8% 54.1% 42.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 2012 22/22 3.6 3.2 61.1% 63.1% 47.1% 55.0% 39.0% 57.0% 37.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 2013 5/5 3.0 1.0 65.7% 66.0% 51.2% 68.6% 33.3% 60.7% 33.2% 2010 6/6 2.5 1.8 66.2% 60.9% 51.8% 60.4% 46.9% 57.6% 36.1%
23 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2011 29/29 3.9 3.0 60.1% 69.1% 50.5% 63.4% 38.7% 61.6% 37.0%
24 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2012 55/56 3.2 3.3 59.1% 66.7% 51.5% 59.4% 43.4% 60.6% 38.7%
25 2016 1/1 1.0 3.0 66.7% 50.0% 55.0% 28.6% 25.0% 51.7% 41.8% 2013 41/41 3.4 2.4 61.5% 69.1% 53.3% 51.7% 44.1% 62.9% 37.6%
26 2017 11/11 3.5 2.8 62.1% 62.5% 44.3% 51.6% 47.3% 55.4% 41.8% 2014 33/33 2.3 2.0 64.4% 65.9% 50.1% 52.1% 47.9% 60.1% 37.3%
27 2018 2/2 0.5 4.0 53.8% 55.6% 33.9% 30.6% 25.0% 45.9% 31.6% 2015 39/39 3.6 2.2 62.9% 68.7% 53.8% 64.3% 41.5% 63.2% 35.8%
28 2019 17/17 3.4 2.7 62.0% 66.9% 47.9% 47.2% 32.0% 59.6% 34.4% 2016 64/65 3.7 2.8 62.8% 68.4% 51.1% 59.0% 48.8% 61.9% 37.7%
29 2020 5/5 6.4 4.2 58.1% 69.4% 55.1% 70.2% 24.2% 63.3% 35.4% 2017 63/63 4.5 2.6 61.4% 67.8% 52.8% 58.9% 39.0% 62.0% 37.9%
30 2021 5/5 3.4 2.2 67.0% 68.5% 30.2% 41.0% 56.9% 55.1% 33.4% 2018 46/46 3.9 2.8 60.6% 69.6% 48.7% 59.4% 32.8% 61.3% 33.7%
31 2022 2/2 11.0 3.0 61.4% 81.8% 47.9% 62.5% 37.5% 68.5% 31.3% 2019 54/54 2.9 1.8 63.4% 69.5% 54.3% 61.2% 45.2% 63.8% 37.8%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2020 23/23 2.3 2.7 61.6% 64.6% 53.3% 58.9% 39.7% 60.5% 36.9%
33 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2021 49/49 2.9 2.4 62.6% 68.5% 51.5% 53.8% 42.1% 62.1% 39.0%
34 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2022 51/51 2.5 1.8 64.9% 66.5% 51.5% 56.6% 42.9% 61.2% 37.8%
35 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2023 35/35 2.9 2.0 65.2% 65.2% 50.1% 64.4% 42.5% 60.1% 37.2%
36 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2024 12/12 1.0 1.8 61.5% 59.6% 44.2% 50.8% 37.1% 53.8% 34.6%
37 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2025 2/2 2.0 2.5 64.5% 61.5% 52.5% 56.0% 37.5% 58.0% 31.5%
Career — 78/78 3.7 2.9 61.3% 64.8% 46.0% 52.7% 38.8% 57.5% 36.9% — 602/604 3.3 2.4 62.4% 67.6% 51.6% 58.5% 42.4% 61.5% 37.3%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Cedrik-Marcel Stebe Albert Ramos-Vinolas
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 2009 1484 101.9 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2010 1506 106.8 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1487 98.6 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2011 1656 124.3 -2.38 +1.02 0.921 48.4% — +40 — 47.4% -0.32 1–1 2–1 (67%) — -0.49 2008 1480 92.4 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2012 1649 129.6 -2.87 +0.09 0.863 47.3% -137 +69 +21 34.5% -1.02 3–3 (50%) 2–1 (67%) — -0.72 2009 1471 102.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2013 1655 125.4 -0.33 +1.03 0.845 47.6% -42 — — 36.4% -0.91 — — — -0.64 2010 1554 112.8 -2.03 -1.22 0.853 47.4% — +71 — 40.0% -0.73 1–2 (33%) 1–2 (33%) — +0.05
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 1723 132.7 -0.88 -0.32 0.962 49.3% -126 +59 — 43.7% -0.32 5–5 (50%) 3–5 (38%) — -0.23
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 1729 149.2 -1.59 +1.54 0.983 49.6% -70 +70 — 45.2% -0.28 4–7 (36%) 12–18 (40%) — -0.55
25 2016 1619 110.1 -2.23 -2.36 0.865 46.5% — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — -0.07 2013 1646 141.1 -0.38 +0.44 1.014 50.1% -91 +168 -87 48.5% -0.15 5–10 (33%) 7–9 (44%) — +0.49
26 2017 1725 126.8 -2.78 +1.61 0.937 48.5% -57 +23 — 46.2% -0.08 2–2 (50%) 1–1 — -0.07 2014 1727 143.5 -2.00 +0.37 0.934 48.8% -165 +124 — 38.0% -0.28 6–4 (60%) 1–11 (8%) — -1.20
27 2018 1685 98.4 -2.91 -1.42 0.585 39.5% — — — 0.0% -3.67 — — — +0.06 2015 1768 152.4 -0.04 +0.07 0.974 49.5% -88 +32 -159 43.6% -0.40 3–10 (23%) 7–5 (58%) — -1.24
28 2019 1717 124.6 -3.67 -1.03 0.852 47.1% -44 +30 — 37.8% -0.89 4–1 (80%) 3–4 (43%) — +0.23 2016 1884 158.2 -1.18 +1.68 0.990 49.9% -90 +94 -207 48.8% +0.06 14–8 (64%) 8–16 (33%) — -2.25
29 2020 1680 116.8 -1.06 +0.67 0.965 49.8% -5 — — 42.9% -0.57 1–1 1–1 — +0.02 2017 1814 155.6 -0.89 +1.55 0.996 50.0% -85 +157 -119 50.0% +0.10 18–14 (56%) 14–18 (44%) — +3.34
30 2021 1554 108.6 -3.79 -0.78 0.745 44.7% +63 — — 30.0% -1.60 0–1 — — -0.32 2018 1700 139.0 -1.71 -1.37 0.872 47.7% -16 +112 — 42.0% -0.71 9–10 (47%) 11–7 (61%) — +2.45
31 2022 1558 109.4 -3.26 +1.51 0.993 49.7% — — — 40.0% -0.20 1–0 1–2 (33%) — -0.05 2019 1855 153.7 +0.41 +1.33 1.046 50.9% -114 +113 — 53.2% +0.32 7–6 (54%) 8–14 (36%) — -1.29
32 2023 1546 99.1 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 1704 132.0 -1.84 -0.55 0.934 48.9% -30 +113 — 43.3% -0.38 3–6 (33%) 4–11 (27%) — +0.07
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 1731 142.2 -0.29 +1.34 1.029 50.4% -66 +87 -159 48.1% -0.02 13–12 (52%) 7–14 (33%) — -0.43
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 1742 139.7 -1.81 +1.14 0.973 49.3% -91 +77 — 47.2% -0.26 8–10 (44%) 10–12 (45%) — +1.15
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 1645 131.6 -2.86 -0.15 0.933 48.8% -74 +108 — 37.9% -0.32 9–10 (47%) 3–11 (21%) — +1.27
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2024 1564 117.8 -4.99 -1.79 0.749 44.7% — +77 — 21.4% -1.93 2–0 0–4 (0%) — -0.06
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2025 1566 115.1 +0.20 +0.65 0.750 45.0% — — — 0.0% -2.60 — — — -0.39
Career — 1756 128.0 -2.76 +0.16 0.868 47.4% -58 +43 +21 37.8% -0.83 12–9 (57%) 10–10 (50%) 106.4 -2.63 — 1967 149.2 -1.17 +0.67 0.970 49.4% -82 +102 -148 45.5% -0.21 107–114 (48%) 96–157 (38%) 90.1 +0.20

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.