H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Cedrik-Marcel Stebe vs Jiri Vesely H2H: 1-1
Cedrik-Marcel Stebe and Jiri Vesely are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay. Most recently, Cedrik-Marcel Stebe won the 2019 Gstaad fourth round 7-6(3) 4-6 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Germany
Age 35
Left-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
Czechia
Age 33
Left-Handed
198 cm / 6'6"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 26, 2019* | Gstaad | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Cedrik-Marcel Stebe | 7-6(3) 4-6 6-3 | Jiri Vesely | Match data |
| Jul 18, 2019* | Umag | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Jiri Vesely | 7-6(5) 3-6 7-6(2) | Cedrik-Marcel Stebe | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cedrik-Marcel Stebe | #366 | #71 | 688 | 1,756 | 29 | 49 | 37.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Jiri Vesely | #1,213 | #35 | 1,125 | 1,924 | 129 | 160 | 44.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Cedrik-Marcel Stebe | Jiri Vesely | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #85 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2011 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #81 | 1,656 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 11–16 | 40.7% | #66 | 1,630 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2012 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #177 | 1,649 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 23–28 | 45.1% | #41 | 1,742 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2013 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #167 | 1,654 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 21–21 | 50.0% | #55 | 1,860 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 22–24 | 47.8% | #62 | 1,780 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 14–17 | 45.2% | #89 | 1,777 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2016 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #470 | 1,618 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #105 | 1,739 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2017 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #82 | 1,725 | 0 | 0 | 2020 | 10–6 | 62.5% | #68 | 1,764 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 2018 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #507 | 1,684 | 0 | 0 | 2021 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #83 | 1,629 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 2019 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #165 | 1,715 | 0 | 0 | 2022 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #109 | 1,693 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 2020 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #126 | 1,679 | 0 | 0 | 2023 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #292 | 1,709 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | 2021 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #227 | 1,553 | 0 | 0 | 2024 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #341 | 1,670 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | 2022 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #203 | 1,557 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |