H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Cedrik-Marcel Stebe vs Joao Souza H2H: 1-0
Cedrik-Marcel Stebe holds a 1–0 lead over Joao Souza in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Cedrik-Marcel Stebe leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Cedrik-Marcel Stebe won the 2012 Roland Garros first round 6-3 2-0 RET.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Germany
Age 35
Left-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
BRA
Age 38
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 29, 2012* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Cedrik-Marcel Stebe | 6-3 2-0 (ret.) | Joao Souza | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cedrik-Marcel Stebe | #366 | #71 | 688 | 1,756 | 29 | 49 | 37.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Joao Souza | #1,306 | #69 | 687 | 1,669 | 25 | 47 | 34.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Cedrik-Marcel Stebe | Joao Souza | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 20 | 2011 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #81 | 1,656 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2012 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #177 | 1,649 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2013 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #167 | 1,654 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #111 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 7–8 | 46.7% | #104 | 1,602 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #144 | 1,553 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2016 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #470 | 1,618 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #140 | 1,631 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2017 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #82 | 1,725 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #90 | 1,598 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2018 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #507 | 1,684 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 6–16 | 27.3% | #142 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2019 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #165 | 1,715 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #123 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2020 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #126 | 1,679 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #246 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2021 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #227 | 1,553 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2022 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #203 | 1,557 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |