H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:15 UTC
Cedrik-Marcel Stebe vs Leonardo Mayer
Compare the head-to-head record, career totals, season-by-season performance, and match log for Cedrik-Marcel Stebe vs Leonardo Mayer.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Germany
Age 35
Left-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
0
–
0
0 main draw meetings
ARG
Age 39
Right-Handed
191 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No head-to-head meetings found. | ||||||||
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cedrik-Marcel Stebe | #366 | #71 | 688 | 1,756 | 29 | 49 | 37.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Leonardo Mayer | #748 | #21 | 1,605 | 1,937 | 166 | 194 | 46.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Cedrik-Marcel Stebe | Leonardo Mayer | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 20 | 2011 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #81 | 1,656 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2012 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #177 | 1,649 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #115 | 1,476 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2013 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #167 | 1,654 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 18–18 | 50.0% | #75 | 1,674 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #94 | 1,652 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #78 | 1,677 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2016 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #470 | 1,618 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #71 | 1,725 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2017 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #82 | 1,725 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #94 | 1,715 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2018 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #507 | 1,684 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 26–20 | 56.5% | #28 | 1,830 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2019 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #165 | 1,715 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 24–23 | 51.1% | #35 | 1,837 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2020 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #126 | 1,679 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 9–15 | 37.5% | #139 | 1,727 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 2021 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #227 | 1,553 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 11–8 | 57.9% | #52 | 1,796 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | 2022 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #203 | 1,557 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 22–25 | 46.8% | #56 | 1,746 | 0 | 2 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 16–18 | 47.1% | #92 | 1,710 | 0 | 2 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 0–7 | 0.0% | #135 | 1,605 | 0 | 2 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #309 | 1,520 | 0 | 2 |