H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Cedrik-Marcel Stebe vs Lleyton Hewitt H2H: 0-1

Lleyton Hewitt holds a 1–0 lead over Cedrik-Marcel Stebe in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Lleyton Hewitt leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Lleyton Hewitt won the 2012 Australian Open first round 7-5 6-4 3-6 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Cedrik-Marcel Stebe
Germany Age 35 Left-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main draw meetings
Lleyton Hewitt
AUS Age 45 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Lleyton Hewitt #181 7-5 6-4 3-6 7-5 Cedrik-Marcel Stebe #83 Match data Jan 18, 2012* R128 Australian Open Grand Slam Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Cedrik-Marcel Stebe #382 #71 688 1,756 29 49 37.2% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lleyton Hewitt #636 #1 5,205 2,160 567 244 69.9% 2 2 2 2 22 30

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Cedrik-Marcel Stebe Lleyton Hewitt
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 1997 0–1 0.0% — 1,493 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 1998 10–9 52.6% #100 1,615 0 1
18 — — — — — — — 1999 40–18 69.0% #25 1,854 0 2
19 — — — — — — — 2000 53–16 76.8% #7 1,980 0 6
20 2011 4–4 50.0% #81 1,656 0 0 2001 71–15 82.6% #1 2,116 1 12
21 2012 7–15 31.8% #177 1,649 0 0 2002 61–16 79.2% #1 2,066 2 17
22 2013 2–3 40.0% #167 1,654 0 0 2003 29–10 74.4% #17 1,939 2 19
23 — — — — — — — 2004 64–16 80.0% #3 2,073 2 23
24 — — — — — — — 2005 36–9 80.0% #4 2,114 2 24
25 2016 0–1 0.0% #470 1,619 0 0 2006 32–14 69.6% #20 1,971 2 25
26 2017 5–6 45.5% #82 1,725 0 0 2007 34–15 69.4% #21 1,919 2 26
27 2018 0–2 0.0% #507 1,684 0 0 2008 18–11 62.1% #67 1,936 2 26
28 2019 7–10 41.2% #165 1,716 0 0 2009 33–19 63.5% #22 1,959 2 27
29 2020 2–3 40.0% #126 1,679 0 0 2010 18–11 62.1% #54 1,909 2 28
30 2021 1–4 20.0% #227 1,553 0 0 2011 8–9 47.1% #186 1,818 2 28
31 2022 1–1 50.0% #203 1,557 0 0 2012 15–12 55.6% #83 1,884 2 28
32 — — — — — — — 2013 22–18 55.0% #60 1,889 2 28
33 — — — — — — — 2014 19–15 55.9% #50 1,841 2 30
34 — — — — — — — 2015 3–9 25.0% #307 1,714 2 30
35 — — — — — — — 2016 1–1 50.0% #633 1,727 2 30

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Cedrik-Marcel Stebe Lleyton Hewitt
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 7 6 13 53.8% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% 2 1 3 66.7%
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 20 10 30 66.7% 6 3 9 66.7% 8 3 11 72.7% 6 2 8 75.0%
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 37 11 48 77.1% 8 3 11 72.7% 5 1 6 83.3% 3 1 4 75.0%
20 2011 — — — — 4 2 6 66.7% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2001 48 10 58 82.8% 10 3 13 76.9% 13 1 14 92.9% 0 1 1 0.0%
21 2012 2 8 10 20.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2002 33 9 42 78.6% 10 5 15 66.7% 14 1 15 93.3% 4 1 5 80.0%
22 2013 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2003 23 6 29 79.3% 4 2 6 66.7% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 44 9 53 83.0% 11 4 15 73.3% 7 2 9 77.8% 2 1 3 66.7%
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 29 7 36 80.6% — — — — 7 2 9 77.8% — — — —
25 2016 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2006 20 11 31 64.5% 3 2 5 60.0% 9 1 10 90.0% — — — —
26 2017 2 3 5 40.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2007 21 9 30 70.0% 10 4 14 71.4% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — —
27 2018 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 10 8 18 55.6% 2 1 3 66.7% 6 2 8 75.0% — — — —
28 2019 3 5 8 37.5% 4 4 8 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2009 18 14 32 56.3% 9 3 12 75.0% 6 2 8 75.0% — — — —
29 2020 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 5 6 11 45.5% 5 4 9 55.6% 8 1 9 88.9% — — — —
30 2021 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2011 5 6 11 45.5% — — — — 3 3 6 50.0% — — — —
31 2022 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 9 7 16 56.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 6 4 10 60.0% — — — —
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 13 12 25 52.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 9 3 12 75.0% — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 11 9 20 55.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 7 2 9 77.8% — — — —
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 3 5 8 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — —
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 12 26 38 31.6% 15 16 31 48.4% 2 7 9 22.2% — — — — — 357 157 514 69.5% 79 43 122 64.8% 114 37 151 75.5% 17 7 24 70.8%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 78/78 of Cedrik-Marcel Stebe's and 753/811 of Lleyton Hewitt's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Cedrik-Marcel Stebe Lleyton Hewitt
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
16 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1997 1/1 4.0 3.0 55.6% 56.7% 43.8% 58.8% 50.0% 50.9% 30.8%
17 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1998 18/19 2.8 4.1 54.8% 68.2% 51.4% 54.4% 39.1% 60.4% 40.6%
18 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1999 51/58 3.9 2.2 59.1% 71.5% 56.2% 61.1% 49.8% 65.1% 42.8%
19 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2000 56/69 6.3 3.6 53.9% 75.5% 55.3% 64.9% 51.6% 66.2% 41.8%
20 2011 8/8 2.9 3.4 56.2% 61.7% 43.9% 51.9% 47.8% 54.1% 42.3% 2001 72/86 5.5 3.6 53.4% 75.7% 56.2% 60.8% 48.0% 66.5% 44.2%
21 2012 22/22 3.6 3.2 61.1% 63.1% 47.1% 55.0% 39.0% 57.0% 37.1% 2002 62/77 7.2 4.0 51.4% 74.9% 54.3% 59.2% 42.9% 64.7% 43.4%
22 2013 5/5 3.0 1.0 65.7% 66.0% 51.2% 68.6% 33.3% 60.7% 33.2% 2003 39/39 6.5 4.1 51.7% 77.0% 55.0% 62.9% 47.7% 66.2% 44.4%
23 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2004 80/80 6.3 3.6 54.2% 76.8% 55.1% 64.6% 47.8% 66.9% 42.7%
24 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2005 43/45 9.2 3.8 56.4% 78.8% 54.0% 62.8% 45.7% 68.1% 41.3%
25 2016 1/1 1.0 3.0 66.7% 50.0% 55.0% 28.6% 25.0% 51.7% 41.8% 2006 46/46 7.3 3.8 55.1% 71.5% 52.6% 51.5% 46.1% 63.0% 43.0%
26 2017 11/11 3.5 2.8 62.1% 62.5% 44.3% 51.6% 47.3% 55.4% 41.8% 2007 48/49 7.6 3.3 53.6% 76.5% 54.8% 59.0% 51.1% 66.2% 40.3%
27 2018 2/2 0.5 4.0 53.8% 55.6% 33.9% 30.6% 25.0% 45.9% 31.6% 2008 27/29 8.2 3.0 54.5% 76.2% 57.4% 57.7% 37.6% 67.8% 42.0%
28 2019 17/17 3.4 2.7 62.0% 66.9% 47.9% 47.2% 32.0% 59.6% 34.4% 2009 52/52 6.5 3.7 53.3% 76.0% 53.3% 62.4% 41.5% 65.5% 41.5%
29 2020 5/5 6.4 4.2 58.1% 69.4% 55.1% 70.2% 24.2% 63.3% 35.4% 2010 29/29 6.3 2.9 56.7% 74.5% 52.0% 56.1% 55.1% 64.6% 42.0%
30 2021 5/5 3.4 2.2 67.0% 68.5% 30.2% 41.0% 56.9% 55.1% 33.4% 2011 17/17 6.6 3.8 56.3% 72.4% 48.7% 54.8% 43.7% 61.8% 37.3%
31 2022 2/2 11.0 3.0 61.4% 81.8% 47.9% 62.5% 37.5% 68.5% 31.3% 2012 24/27 5.8 4.2 52.4% 70.5% 47.8% 57.9% 41.3% 59.7% 37.7%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2013 40/40 6.2 4.0 51.1% 70.1% 51.9% 59.4% 46.6% 61.1% 39.0%
33 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2014 34/34 4.9 4.8 53.5% 72.2% 49.7% 59.4% 44.0% 61.3% 39.9%
34 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2015 12/12 6.8 4.8 54.4% 68.6% 51.2% 55.9% 42.4% 60.7% 37.7%
35 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2016 2/2 6.0 4.0 54.8% 71.6% 47.1% 70.8% 22.9% 60.4% 38.4%
Career — 78/78 3.7 2.9 61.3% 64.8% 46.0% 52.7% 38.8% 57.5% 36.9% — 753/811 6.4 3.7 54.1% 74.4% 53.8% 60.2% 46.4% 64.9% 41.8%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Cedrik-Marcel Stebe Lleyton Hewitt
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 1493 104.6 +1.87 +1.38 0.627 41.7% — — — 0.0% -2.67 — — — -0.13
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 1615 137.2 -0.46 +2.56 1.025 50.0% +26 — -8 52.9% +0.21 5–6 (45%) 7–4 (64%) — -0.28
18 2009 1484 101.9 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 1854 154.0 +2.80 +4.93 1.226 53.8% -9 -254 -123 64.6% +1.10 12–9 (57%) 8–10 (44%) — -2.41
19 2010 1506 106.8 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 1980 166.2 +3.71 +4.99 1.237 53.9% +30 -228 -146 69.5% +1.24 14–6 (70%) 11–14 (44%) — -2.06
20 2011 1656 124.3 -2.38 +1.02 0.921 48.4% — +40 — 47.4% -0.32 1–1 2–1 (67%) — -0.49 2001 2117 162.4 +4.29 +6.67 1.319 54.9% +8 -224 -121 72.0% +1.50 24–9 (73%) 13–9 (59%) — +1.18
21 2012 1649 129.6 -2.87 +0.09 0.863 47.3% -137 +69 +21 34.5% -1.02 3–3 (50%) 2–1 (67%) — -0.72 2002 2066 162.1 +3.20 +6.04 1.230 53.8% +19 -160 +114 70.4% +1.26 18–1 (95%) 18–12 (60%) — -1.87
22 2013 1655 125.4 -0.33 +1.03 0.845 47.6% -42 — — 36.4% -0.91 — — — -0.64 2003 1940 148.3 +2.77 +6.39 1.313 54.9% +95 -50 +219 66.4% +1.31 8–5 (62%) 8–9 (47%) — +1.40
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 2074 161.5 +4.35 +6.35 1.292 54.5% +33 -141 +46 72.4% +1.40 13–6 (68%) 17–7 (71%) — -2.32
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 2115 161.5 +4.84 +5.29 1.294 54.3% +42 — +76 69.3% +1.35 12–0 (100%) 14–10 (58%) — -1.18
25 2016 1619 110.1 -2.23 -2.36 0.865 46.5% — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — -0.07 2006 1972 142.5 +1.60 +4.43 1.161 52.6% -20 -18 +235 63.1% +0.95 13–5 (72%) 9–8 (53%) — +0.55
26 2017 1725 126.8 -2.78 +1.61 0.937 48.5% -57 +23 — 46.2% -0.08 2–2 (50%) 1–1 — -0.07 2007 1919 154.1 +2.55 +3.26 1.191 53.1% -12 +96 +217 64.8% +0.95 7–5 (58%) 7–13 (35%) — +1.23
27 2018 1685 98.4 -2.91 -1.42 0.585 39.5% — — — 0.0% -3.67 — — — +0.06 2008 1937 143.9 +3.50 +4.91 1.303 53.9% -73 +79 +208 61.5% +1.03 2–3 (40%) 4–10 (29%) — -1.01
28 2019 1717 124.6 -3.67 -1.03 0.852 47.1% -44 +30 — 37.8% -0.89 4–1 (80%) 3–4 (43%) — +0.23 2009 1960 156.8 +1.58 +4.92 1.202 53.0% -71 +63 +224 61.0% +0.81 11–9 (55%) 8–12 (40%) — -1.75
29 2020 1680 116.8 -1.06 +0.67 0.965 49.8% -5 — — 42.9% -0.57 1–1 1–1 — +0.02 2010 1909 143.7 +1.71 +4.35 1.187 53.0% -77 +73 +318 56.2% +0.49 6–3 (67%) 6–2 (75%) — -0.34
30 2021 1554 108.6 -3.79 -0.78 0.745 44.7% +63 — — 30.0% -1.60 0–1 — — -0.32 2011 1819 131.8 -1.17 +0.07 0.976 49.8% -42 — +318 52.3% +0.32 2–4 (33%) 3–5 (38%) — -0.11
31 2022 1558 109.4 -3.26 +1.51 0.993 49.7% — — — 40.0% -0.20 1–0 1–2 (33%) — -0.05 2012 1884 145.7 -2.14 +1.74 0.935 48.9% 0 — +205 50.0% -0.29 6–3 (67%) 4–4 (50%) — -0.31
32 2023 1546 99.1 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 1889 147.2 -2.06 +2.77 1.005 50.2% -35 -33 +197 51.8% +0.17 12–8 (60%) 9–7 (56%) — -1.05
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 1842 149.1 -2.59 +3.22 1.032 50.5% +15 -61 +258 52.3% +0.10 9–4 (69%) 4–7 (36%) — -0.31
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 1715 118.7 -3.34 +0.79 0.958 49.2% +73 — +259 40.5% -0.65 0–7 (0%) 2–1 (67%) — +0.96
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 1727 113.5 +0.52 +0.37 0.970 49.3% — — — 50.0% -0.17 — 1–0 — +0.04
Career — 1756 128.0 -2.76 +0.16 0.868 47.4% -58 +43 +21 37.8% -0.83 12–9 (57%) 10–10 (50%) 106.4 -2.63 — 2160 162.0 +2.20 +4.74 1.192 53.1% +6 -84 +125 63.9% +0.95 174–93 (65%) 153–144 (52%) 100.9 -1.21

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.