H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Cedrik-Marcel Stebe vs Ricardas Berankis H2H: 0-1
Ricardas Berankis holds a 1–0 lead over Cedrik-Marcel Stebe in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Ricardas Berankis leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Ricardas Berankis won the 2020 Pune fourth round 7-6(2) 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Germany
Age 35
Left-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
Lithuania
Age 36
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 14, 2021 | Halle | ATP 500 | Q1 | Grass | Ricardas Berankis | 6-4 2-1 (ret.) | Cedrik-Marcel Stebe | Match data |
| Feb 7, 2020* | Pune | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Ricardas Berankis | 7-6(2) 6-1 | Cedrik-Marcel Stebe | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cedrik-Marcel Stebe | #366 | #71 | 688 | 1,756 | 29 | 49 | 37.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Ricardas Berankis | #435 | #50 | 909 | 1,830 | 104 | 145 | 41.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Cedrik-Marcel Stebe | Ricardas Berankis | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #455 | 1,535 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2011 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #81 | 1,656 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #87 | 1,699 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2012 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #177 | 1,649 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #125 | 1,679 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2013 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #167 | 1,654 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 10–5 | 66.7% | #113 | 1,771 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 11–16 | 40.7% | #131 | 1,655 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #86 | 1,722 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2016 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #470 | 1,618 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #85 | 1,714 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2017 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #82 | 1,725 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 8–14 | 36.4% | #92 | 1,675 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2018 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #507 | 1,684 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #136 | 1,720 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2019 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #165 | 1,715 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #116 | 1,684 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2020 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #126 | 1,679 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #66 | 1,726 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2021 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #227 | 1,553 | 0 | 0 | 2020 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #69 | 1,785 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2022 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #203 | 1,557 | 0 | 0 | 2021 | 13–18 | 41.9% | #104 | 1,710 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #168 | 1,661 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #238 | 1,645 | 0 | 0 |