H2H data updated: 2026-09-02 00:00 UTC

Cem Ilkel vs Mikhail Youzhny H2H: 0-1

Mikhail Youzhny holds a 1–0 lead over Cem Ilkel in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Mikhail Youzhny leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Mikhail Youzhny won the 2017 Istanbul round of 32 3-6 6-3 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Cem Ilkel
Turkiye Age 31 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main draw meetings
Mikhail Youzhny
RUS Age 44 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Mikhail Youzhny #88 3-6 6-3 6-3 Cem Ilkel #323 Match data May 4, 2017* R32 Istanbul ATP 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Cem Ilkel #589 #144 468 1,500 3 17 15.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Mikhail Youzhny #115 #8 3,500 2,069 482 408 54.2% 0 0 0 2 8 10

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Cem Ilkel Mikhail Youzhny
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 — — — — — — — 1999 0–1 0.0% #286 1,493 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 2000 5–8 38.5% #113 1,532 0 0
19 2015 0–2 0.0% #435 1,488 0 0 2001 20–18 52.6% #58 1,695 0 0
20 2016 0–2 0.0% #365 1,462 0 0 2002 30–22 57.7% #32 1,867 0 1
21 2017 0–3 0.0% #257 1,443 0 0 2003 28–26 51.9% #43 1,746 0 1
22 2018 0–2 0.0% #249 1,415 0 0 2004 41–26 61.2% #16 1,883 0 2
23 2019 0–2 0.0% #283 1,418 0 0 2005 23–21 52.3% #43 1,760 0 2
24 2020 1–1 50.0% #219 1,416 0 0 2006 23–22 51.1% #24 1,826 0 2
25 2021 0–2 0.0% #144 1,479 0 0 2007 48–24 66.7% #19 1,890 0 3
26 2022 0–2 0.0% #378 1,455 0 0 2008 26–20 56.5% #32 1,771 0 4
27 2023 2–1 66.7% #255 1,452 0 0 2009 41–27 60.3% #19 1,962 0 5
28 — — — — — — — 2010 40–19 67.8% #10 1,944 0 7
29 — — — — — — — 2011 24–22 52.2% #35 1,838 0 7
30 — — — — — — — 2012 33–22 60.0% #25 1,892 0 8
31 — — — — — — — 2013 39–24 61.9% #15 2,015 0 10
32 — — — — — — — 2014 18–24 42.9% #48 1,797 0 10
33 — — — — — — — 2015 9–24 27.3% #127 1,701 0 10
34 — — — — — — — 2016 17–20 45.9% #57 1,781 0 10
35 — — — — — — — 2017 10–20 33.3% #84 1,682 0 10
36 — — — — — — — 2018 7–18 28.0% #115 1,650 0 10

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Cem Ilkel Mikhail Youzhny
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 — — — — — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 2 4 6 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
19 2015 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2001 10 7 17 58.8% 5 7 12 41.7% 5 3 8 62.5% 0 1 1 0.0%
20 2016 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2002 10 10 20 50.0% 14 7 21 66.7% 6 3 9 66.7% 0 2 2 0.0%
21 2017 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2003 12 12 24 50.0% 9 8 17 52.9% 4 3 7 57.1% 3 3 6 50.0%
22 2018 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2004 18 13 31 58.1% 6 6 12 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 15 4 19 78.9%
23 2019 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2005 10 11 21 47.6% 6 6 12 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 4 2 6 66.7%
24 2020 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 13 10 23 56.5% 5 7 12 41.7% 2 2 4 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0%
25 2021 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 24 12 36 66.7% 13 8 21 61.9% 5 2 7 71.4% 6 2 8 75.0%
26 2022 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 19 14 33 57.6% 3 4 7 42.9% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — —
27 2023 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 27 16 43 62.8% 11 8 19 57.9% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — —
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 27 12 39 69.2% 12 5 17 70.6% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 12 13 25 48.0% 9 8 17 52.9% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — —
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 20 13 33 60.6% 6 6 12 50.0% 7 3 10 70.0% — — — —
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 20 15 35 57.1% 12 7 19 63.2% 7 2 9 77.8% — — — —
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 10 13 23 43.5% 7 9 16 43.8% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 6 12 18 33.3% 3 9 12 25.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — —
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 9 11 20 45.0% 3 6 9 33.3% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — —
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 7 11 18 38.9% 1 6 7 14.3% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — —
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 6 11 17 35.3% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 4 4 0.0% — — — —
Career — 3 10 13 23.1% 0 4 4 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — 262 220 482 54.4% 126 122 248 50.8% 61 47 108 56.5% 33 19 52 63.5%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 20/20 of Cem Ilkel's and 852/890 of Mikhail Youzhny's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Cem Ilkel Mikhail Youzhny
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
17 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1999 1/1 5.0 2.0 55.1% 70.4% 36.4% 25.0% 0.0% 55.1% 33.3%
18 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2000 11/13 2.9 2.9 60.2% 66.1% 50.0% 53.7% 40.2% 59.9% 35.0%
19 2015 2/2 3.0 3.0 53.3% 50.9% 43.4% 54.0% 25.0% 47.4% 26.1% 2001 34/38 3.4 2.6 62.0% 68.1% 49.9% 55.5% 45.4% 61.1% 39.5%
20 2016 2/2 0.5 3.0 64.4% 49.2% 41.4% 38.2% 38.3% 46.1% 40.8% 2002 39/52 2.7 2.6 63.7% 68.2% 50.6% 58.4% 45.3% 61.8% 39.5%
21 2017 3/3 4.7 2.0 62.9% 72.0% 45.5% 48.3% 50.0% 61.6% 29.9% 2003 53/54 3.0 2.8 57.2% 67.1% 48.5% 58.0% 37.1% 59.2% 39.4%
22 2018 2/2 4.0 1.5 56.8% 69.1% 45.1% 14.3% 33.3% 58.8% 29.8% 2004 63/67 5.4 2.9 57.6% 72.2% 52.4% 59.3% 42.9% 63.6% 38.4%
23 2019 2/2 3.5 1.0 67.7% 69.9% 45.7% 50.0% 100.0% 62.2% 25.7% 2005 44/44 4.1 2.6 57.0% 70.9% 53.2% 51.4% 50.5% 63.2% 40.7%
24 2020 2/2 6.0 2.0 62.5% 62.4% 50.8% 65.0% 34.7% 58.2% 36.0% 2006 44/45 3.9 2.5 58.5% 69.1% 51.2% 56.8% 43.6% 61.5% 39.5%
25 2021 2/2 6.5 2.5 60.7% 63.4% 53.1% 69.9% 25.0% 59.3% 20.1% 2007 68/72 4.9 2.1 59.9% 73.2% 53.4% 63.5% 45.9% 65.1% 39.9%
26 2022 2/2 2.5 3.5 64.5% 64.9% 41.3% 29.2% 50.0% 56.6% 31.3% 2008 43/46 4.7 2.4 62.9% 72.4% 52.8% 69.2% 48.4% 65.1% 38.8%
27 2023 3/3 5.7 0.7 61.7% 68.4% 56.2% 65.3% 42.9% 63.7% 34.0% 2009 68/68 3.9 2.2 61.9% 71.9% 52.9% 54.5% 41.4% 64.6% 38.7%
28 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2010 58/59 4.3 2.7 63.4% 72.1% 52.3% 58.7% 44.5% 64.9% 40.1%
29 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2011 46/46 3.9 2.8 60.7% 70.1% 53.0% 53.9% 41.5% 63.4% 38.3%
30 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2012 53/55 4.4 2.2 62.1% 71.8% 54.6% 61.1% 43.6% 65.1% 39.8%
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2013 63/63 4.4 2.5 62.2% 71.0% 50.7% 66.4% 45.0% 63.3% 38.2%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2014 41/42 3.5 2.4 62.7% 66.9% 53.0% 56.4% 40.9% 61.6% 38.7%
33 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2015 33/33 2.7 3.2 59.2% 66.7% 50.2% 49.6% 35.8% 59.6% 33.1%
34 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2016 35/37 3.7 3.2 59.4% 67.4% 52.1% 59.9% 40.2% 61.3% 37.0%
35 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2017 30/30 3.7 3.6 60.5% 67.3% 48.1% 61.1% 43.3% 59.4% 35.0%
36 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2018 25/25 3.4 3.8 60.6% 67.6% 49.5% 55.8% 32.8% 60.4% 35.1%
Career — 20/20 4.2 2.1 61.7% 64.0% 47.3% 49.1% 44.6% 57.7% 30.6% — 852/890 4.0 2.7 60.6% 70.1% 51.8% 58.6% 43.0% 62.8% 38.6%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Cem Ilkel Mikhail Youzhny
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 1494 101.7 -2.13 -1.94 0.742 42.6% — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — -0.07
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 1532 116.4 -1.96 -1.12 0.873 47.6% +26 — — 42.4% -0.67 3–4 (43%) 4–4 (50%) — -0.21
19 2015 1488 100.2 -2.69 -2.84 0.497 38.2% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — -0.07 2001 1695 126.0 -1.14 +1.28 1.015 50.1% -22 -188 -31 51.5% -0.02 5–8 (38%) 13–8 (62%) — +0.55
20 2016 1462 104.3 -1.62 -0.64 0.757 43.1% — — — 0.0% -3.25 — 0–1 — -0.14 2002 1867 145.9 +0.65 +2.55 1.032 50.8% -141 -102 -103 54.4% +0.46 10–10 (50%) 10–9 (53%) — -3.92
21 2017 1443 102.5 -1.90 -2.97 0.780 45.5% — — — 25.0% -1.50 0–2 0–1 — +0.10 2003 1746 135.3 -1.76 +1.88 0.964 49.2% -42 +20 +25 50.4% -0.02 8–7 (53%) 10–9 (53%) — -1.28
22 2018 1416 95.7 -3.32 -0.86 0.722 43.6% — — — 0.0% -2.50 — 0–1 — +0.06 2004 1883 148.3 +0.81 +2.00 1.057 50.9% +22 -143 -152 58.0% +0.41 15–10 (60%) 19–14 (58%) — -1.36
23 2019 1419 101.9 -0.12 -1.48 0.681 44.1% — — — 0.0% -2.00 — 0–1 — +0.26 2005 1761 139.5 +1.26 +2.88 1.104 51.5% +3 -18 +10 53.6% +0.39 5–9 (36%) 6–7 (46%) — +0.69
24 2020 1417 104.3 +0.36 -2.51 0.860 47.1% — — — 40.0% -0.20 1–0 — — -0.01 2006 1827 146.7 -0.47 +1.85 1.025 50.4% +34 -99 -76 50.0% -0.04 7–3 (70%) 9–5 (64%) — -1.02
25 2021 1480 110.6 +2.13 -2.39 0.495 42.2% — — — 16.7% -2.33 — 0–1 — -0.05 2007 1890 156.9 +2.28 +3.67 1.144 52.4% +38 -97 -62 63.0% +0.84 12–9 (57%) 12–13 (48%) — -1.21
26 2022 1455 95.0 +1.07 -1.88 0.723 44.1% — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — -0.04 2008 1772 147.1 +2.15 +1.93 1.109 52.1% +23 -16 +129 59.0% +0.71 4–7 (36%) 9–10 (47%) — +1.14
27 2023 1452 106.2 -0.07 -1.39 0.937 49.4% +81 — — 57.1% +0.57 1–0 — — +0.20 2009 1963 152.1 +1.37 +2.31 1.091 51.3% +17 -170 -95 55.3% +0.51 17–6 (74%) 12–16 (43%) — -1.41
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 1944 153.8 +1.60 +3.59 1.144 52.5% +51 -65 -122 62.6% +0.83 15–9 (63%) 19–13 (59%) — +2.19
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 1839 149.8 +0.30 +1.58 1.047 50.8% +13 +8 +51 53.5% +0.28 8–11 (42%) 9–8 (53%) — +0.33
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 1893 159.3 +1.93 +3.49 1.139 52.2% -5 -19 +111 56.5% +0.59 11–6 (65%) 10–12 (45%) — -1.62
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 2015 164.9 +0.69 +2.03 1.041 51.0% -59 -9 +84 59.5% +0.53 14–8 (64%) 11–10 (52%) — -0.08
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 1797 144.6 -1.83 +1.95 1.007 50.1% +17 +64 +233 48.5% -0.02 3–8 (27%) 7–8 (47%) — +2.82
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 1702 140.9 -2.85 -2.15 0.819 46.5% +90 -22 +196 30.3% -1.08 3–4 (43%) 4–4 (50%) — -0.03
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 1781 137.7 -1.76 +0.85 0.955 49.4% +35 -167 +92 54.0% +0.11 5–8 (38%) 8–4 (67%) — -0.48
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 1683 134.2 -3.41 -0.63 0.861 47.7% +46 -135 +177 43.6% -0.49 2–9 (18%) 5–4 (56%) — +1.50
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 1651 126.8 -2.94 -0.47 0.887 47.6% +27 -111 +190 35.0% -0.88 2–5 (29%) 4–7 (36%) — +0.38
Career — 1500 105.3 -0.71 -1.91 0.722 44.5% +81 — — 19.6% -1.74 2–2 (50%) 0–5 (0%) 97.8 +1.55 — 2069 153.2 +0.17 +1.94 1.036 50.6% +9 -65 +30 53.8% +0.27 149–141 (51%) 181–165 (52%) 100.7 -0.35

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.