H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Charlie Pasarell vs Brian Fairlie H2H: 3-1
Charlie Pasarell holds a 3–1 lead over Brian Fairlie in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Charlie Pasarell leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Brian Fairlie won the 1976 Maui fourth round 7-6 5-7 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 82
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
3
–
1
4 main draw meetings
NZL
Age 78
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 8, 1976* | Maui | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Brian Fairlie | 7-6 5-7 6-3 | Charlie Pasarell | Match data |
| Jun 4, 1973* | Rome | Masters 1000 | R64 | Clay | Charlie Pasarell | 6-4 6-4 | Brian Fairlie | Match data |
| Aug 16, 1972* | Cleveland Wct | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Charlie Pasarell | 6-3 6-4 | Brian Fairlie | Match data |
| Jul 4, 1972* | St. Louis Wct | ATP 250 | R32 | Carpet | Charlie Pasarell | 6-3 6-4 | Brian Fairlie | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Charlie Pasarell | #312 | #35 | 0 | 1,939 | 302 | 275 | 52.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Brian Fairlie | #332 | #24 | 0 | 1,916 | 233 | 220 | 51.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Charlie Pasarell | Brian Fairlie | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1968 | 8–9 | 47.1% | — | 1,504 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1969 | 13–14 | 48.1% | — | 1,592 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1970 | 36–20 | 64.3% | — | 1,800 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1971 | 20–29 | 40.8% | — | 1,662 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1968 | 38–18 | 67.9% | — | 1,650 | 0 | 1 | 1972 | 13–27 | 32.5% | — | 1,720 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1969 | 43–31 | 58.1% | — | 1,668 | 0 | 1 | 1973 | 33–21 | 61.1% | #25 | 1,773 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 1970 | 27–22 | 55.1% | — | 1,749 | 0 | 1 | 1974 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #58 | 1,760 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 1971 | 26–32 | 44.8% | — | 1,801 | 0 | 1 | 1975 | 22–17 | 56.4% | #66 | 1,811 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 1972 | 35–27 | 56.5% | — | 1,840 | 0 | 2 | 1976 | 40–28 | 58.8% | #36 | 1,843 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 1973 | 40–31 | 56.3% | #47 | 1,834 | 0 | 3 | 1977 | 25–24 | 51.0% | #92 | 1,667 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | 1974 | 29–26 | 52.7% | #51 | 1,768 | 0 | 4 | 1978 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #123 | 1,648 | 0 | 3 |
| 31 | 1975 | 22–25 | 46.8% | #63 | 1,715 | 0 | 4 | 1979 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #332 | 1,607 | 0 | 3 |
| 32 | 1976 | 24–25 | 49.0% | #56 | 1,815 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 1977 | 13–21 | 38.2% | #71 | 1,650 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 1978 | 4–10 | 28.6% | #200 | 1,607 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 1979 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #312 | 1,563 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |