H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Charlie Pasarell vs Roy Barth H2H: 1-1
Charlie Pasarell and Roy Barth are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Charlie Pasarell won the 1972 Miami Wct third round 6-3 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 82
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
USA
Age 79
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 8, 1972* | Miami Wct | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Charlie Pasarell | 6-3 6-2 | Roy Barth | Match data |
| Oct 3, 1969* | Berkeley | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Roy Barth | 17-19 6-3 6-2 | Charlie Pasarell | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Charlie Pasarell | #312 | #35 | 0 | 1,939 | 302 | 275 | 52.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Roy Barth | #373 | #107 | 0 | 1,736 | 64 | 138 | 31.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Charlie Pasarell | Roy Barth | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1968 | 20–13 | 60.6% | — | 1,618 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1969 | 16–11 | 59.3% | — | 1,691 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1970 | 13–24 | 35.1% | — | 1,579 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1968 | 38–18 | 67.9% | — | 1,650 | 0 | 1 | 1971 | 6–29 | 17.1% | — | 1,463 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1969 | 43–31 | 58.1% | — | 1,668 | 0 | 1 | 1972 | 1–26 | 3.7% | — | 1,402 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1970 | 27–22 | 55.1% | — | 1,749 | 0 | 1 | 1973 | 4–21 | 16.0% | #126 | 1,370 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1971 | 26–32 | 44.8% | — | 1,801 | 0 | 1 | 1974 | 4–13 | 23.5% | #136 | 1,403 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1972 | 35–27 | 56.5% | — | 1,840 | 0 | 2 | 1975 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #373 | 1,396 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 1973 | 40–31 | 56.3% | #47 | 1,834 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1974 | 29–26 | 52.7% | #51 | 1,768 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1975 | 22–25 | 46.8% | #63 | 1,715 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 1976 | 24–25 | 49.0% | #56 | 1,815 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 1977 | 13–21 | 38.2% | #71 | 1,650 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 1978 | 4–10 | 28.6% | #200 | 1,607 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 1979 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #312 | 1,563 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |