H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Chip Hooper vs Russell Simpson H2H: 3-1
Chip Hooper holds a 3–1 lead over Russell Simpson in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on grass, while Chip Hooper leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Chip Hooper won the 1984 Auckland quarterfinal 6-2 2-6 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 67
Right-Handed
198 cm / 6'6"
H2H
3
–
1
4 main draw meetings
NZL
Age 72
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 14, 1984* | Auckland | ATP 250 | QF | Hard | Chip Hooper | 6-2 2-6 6-4 | Russell Simpson | Match data |
| Mar 25, 1983* | Milan | ATP 250 | R16 | Carpet | Chip Hooper | 7-5 6-2 | Russell Simpson | Match data |
| Jun 25, 1982* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R64 | Grass | Russell Simpson | 6-3 1-6 6-3 6-7 11-9 | Chip Hooper | Match data |
| Jun 9, 1982* | Queen's Club | ATP 250 | R64 | Grass | Chip Hooper | 6-2 0-6 10-8 | Russell Simpson | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chip Hooper | #1,046 | #17 | 0 | 1,854 | 104 | 119 | 46.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Russell Simpson | #1,013 | #47 | 0 | 1,765 | 131 | 195 | 40.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Chip Hooper | Russell Simpson | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1972 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,470 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1973 | 3–3 | 50.0% | — | 1,498 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1974 | 5–3 | 62.5% | #318 | 1,539 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1980 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #390 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 | 1975 | 4–15 | 21.1% | #183 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1981 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #390 | 1,538 | 0 | 0 | 1976 | 8–16 | 33.3% | #143 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1982 | 34–24 | 58.6% | #32 | 1,766 | 0 | 0 | 1977 | 6–15 | 28.6% | #126 | 1,451 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1983 | 24–24 | 50.0% | #59 | 1,739 | 0 | 0 | 1978 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #108 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1984 | 18–21 | 46.2% | #96 | 1,600 | 0 | 0 | 1979 | 9–17 | 34.6% | #133 | 1,572 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1985 | 14–18 | 43.8% | #114 | 1,676 | 0 | 0 | 1980 | 20–22 | 47.6% | #76 | 1,695 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1986 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #222 | 1,577 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 15–20 | 42.9% | #88 | 1,644 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1987 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #150 | 1,552 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 19–18 | 51.4% | #50 | 1,672 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 1988 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #561 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #96 | 1,584 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1984 | 9–16 | 36.0% | #121 | 1,545 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 11–11 | 50.0% | #117 | 1,602 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 4–10 | 28.6% | #180 | 1,536 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #324 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 |