H2H data updated: 2026-07-17 14:15 UTC
Chris Lewis vs Bill Scanlon H2H: 1-2
Bill Scanlon holds a 2–1 lead over Chris Lewis in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Bill Scanlon leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Bill Scanlon won the 1983 US Open second round 6-3 6-3 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
NZL
Age 69
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
USA
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 3, 1983* | US Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Bill Scanlon | 6-3 6-3 6-3 | Chris Lewis | Match data |
| Aug 23, 1981* | Cincinnati | Masters 1000 | QF | Hard | Chris Lewis | 6-3 1-6 6-3 | Bill Scanlon | Match data |
| Jan 24, 1980* | Philadelphia | ATP 250 | R32 | Carpet | Bill Scanlon | 6-1 6-1 | Chris Lewis | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chris Lewis | #1,054 | #19 | 8 | 1,863 | 221 | 196 | 53.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Bill Scanlon | #996 | #9 | 56 | 2,017 | 307 | 259 | 54.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 7 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Chris Lewis | Bill Scanlon | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1973 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1974 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #318 | 1,477 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1975 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #396 | 1,460 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1976 | 9–16 | 36.0% | #127 | 1,523 | 0 | 0 | 1976 | 15–17 | 46.9% | #52 | 1,651 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1977 | 18–12 | 60.0% | #51 | 1,743 | 0 | 0 | 1977 | 36–30 | 54.5% | #37 | 1,723 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1978 | 34–26 | 56.7% | #40 | 1,773 | 0 | 1 | 1978 | 14–21 | 40.0% | #95 | 1,764 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1979 | 10–18 | 35.7% | #65 | 1,617 | 0 | 1 | 1979 | 27–19 | 58.7% | #41 | 1,839 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 1980 | 24–24 | 50.0% | #59 | 1,669 | 0 | 1 | 1980 | 37–29 | 56.1% | #25 | 1,808 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 1981 | 41–24 | 63.1% | #31 | 1,829 | 0 | 2 | 1981 | 39–21 | 65.0% | #30 | 1,879 | 0 | 5 |
| 25 | 1982 | 30–20 | 60.0% | #48 | 1,712 | 0 | 2 | 1982 | 31–24 | 56.4% | #71 | 1,852 | 0 | 6 |
| 26 | 1983 | 28–23 | 54.9% | #26 | 1,774 | 0 | 2 | 1983 | 42–21 | 66.7% | #12 | 1,923 | 0 | 6 |
| 27 | 1984 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #93 | 1,649 | 0 | 2 | 1984 | 20–17 | 54.1% | #57 | 1,828 | 0 | 6 |
| 28 | 1985 | 11–11 | 50.0% | #120 | 1,595 | 0 | 3 | 1985 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #180 | 1,668 | 0 | 6 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #85 | 1,656 | 0 | 7 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 16–17 | 48.5% | #99 | 1,562 | 0 | 7 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #224 | 1,534 | 0 | 7 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #320 | 1,598 | 0 | 7 |