H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Chris Lewis vs Hank Pfister H2H: 2-1
Chris Lewis holds a 2–1 lead over Hank Pfister in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Hank Pfister leads 1–0 on carpet, while Chris Lewis leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Hank Pfister won the 1983 Milan third round 6-1 3-6 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
NZL
Age 69
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
USA
Age 72
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 24, 1983* | Milan | ATP 250 | R32 | Carpet | Hank Pfister | 6-1 3-6 6-3 | Chris Lewis | Match data |
| Sep 3, 1981* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Chris Lewis | 7-5 7-6 6-2 | Hank Pfister | Match data |
| Dec 9, 1977* | Adelaide | ATP 250 | R16 | Grass | Chris Lewis | 6-2 6-3 | Hank Pfister | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chris Lewis | #1,054 | #19 | 8 | 1,863 | 221 | 196 | 53.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Hank Pfister | #982 | #19 | 0 | 1,926 | 260 | 213 | 55.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Chris Lewis | Hank Pfister | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1973 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1974 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #318 | 1,477 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1975 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #396 | 1,460 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1976 | 9–16 | 36.0% | #127 | 1,523 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1977 | 18–12 | 60.0% | #51 | 1,743 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1978 | 34–26 | 56.7% | #40 | 1,773 | 0 | 1 | 1975 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #252 | 1,459 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1979 | 10–18 | 35.7% | #65 | 1,617 | 0 | 1 | 1976 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #101 | 1,537 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1980 | 24–24 | 50.0% | #59 | 1,669 | 0 | 1 | 1977 | 37–27 | 57.8% | #48 | 1,741 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1981 | 41–24 | 63.1% | #31 | 1,829 | 0 | 2 | 1978 | 43–26 | 62.3% | #29 | 1,839 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1982 | 30–20 | 60.0% | #48 | 1,712 | 0 | 2 | 1979 | 33–27 | 55.0% | #30 | 1,841 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1983 | 28–23 | 54.9% | #26 | 1,774 | 0 | 2 | 1980 | 21–25 | 45.7% | #62 | 1,727 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1984 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #93 | 1,649 | 0 | 2 | 1981 | 37–21 | 63.8% | #39 | 1,869 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 1985 | 11–11 | 50.0% | #120 | 1,595 | 0 | 3 | 1982 | 35–21 | 62.5% | #24 | 1,831 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1983 | 19–17 | 52.8% | #41 | 1,749 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1984 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #86 | 1,722 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 12–10 | 54.5% | #68 | 1,763 | 0 | 2 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #595 | 1,677 | 0 | 2 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #980 | 1,654 | 0 | 2 |