H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Chris Lewis vs Ion Tiriac H2H: 1-0
Chris Lewis holds a 1–0 lead over Ion Tiriac in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Chris Lewis leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Chris Lewis won the 1976 Little Rock third round 6-3 7-6.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
NZL
Age 69
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
ROU
Age 87
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 4, 1976* | Little Rock | ATP 250 | R32 | Carpet | Chris Lewis | 6-3 7-6 | Ion Tiriac | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chris Lewis | #1,054 | #19 | 8 | 1,863 | 221 | 196 | 53.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Ion Tiriac | #439 | #55 | 0 | 1,899 | 228 | 190 | 54.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 8 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Chris Lewis | Ion Tiriac | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1973 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1974 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #318 | 1,477 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1975 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #396 | 1,460 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1976 | 9–16 | 36.0% | #127 | 1,523 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1977 | 18–12 | 60.0% | #51 | 1,743 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1978 | 34–26 | 56.7% | #40 | 1,773 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1979 | 10–18 | 35.7% | #65 | 1,617 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1980 | 24–24 | 50.0% | #59 | 1,669 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1981 | 41–24 | 63.1% | #31 | 1,829 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1982 | 30–20 | 60.0% | #48 | 1,712 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1983 | 28–23 | 54.9% | #26 | 1,774 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1984 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #93 | 1,649 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1985 | 11–11 | 50.0% | #120 | 1,595 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1968 | 60–12 | 83.3% | — | 1,804 | 0 | 6 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1969 | 14–14 | 50.0% | — | 1,755 | 0 | 6 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1970 | 34–22 | 60.7% | — | 1,795 | 0 | 7 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1971 | 27–16 | 62.8% | — | 1,778 | 0 | 8 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1972 | 21–25 | 45.7% | — | 1,654 | 0 | 8 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1973 | 35–35 | 50.0% | #74 | 1,683 | 0 | 8 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1974 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #72 | 1,622 | 0 | 8 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1975 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #138 | 1,589 | 0 | 8 |
| 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1976 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #248 | 1,534 | 0 | 8 |
| 38 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1977 | 15–20 | 42.9% | #103 | 1,633 | 0 | 8 |
| 39 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1978 | 2–10 | 16.7% | #263 | 1,523 | 0 | 8 |
| 40 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1979 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #439 | 1,525 | 0 | 8 |