H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Chris Lewis vs Jaime Fillol H2H: 0-2
Jaime Fillol holds a 2–0 lead over Chris Lewis in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Jaime Fillol leads 2–0 on carpet. Most recently, Jaime Fillol won the 1978 Rotterdam Wct third round 7-5 0-6 7-6(3).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
NZL
Age 69
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
CHI
Age 80
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 6, 1978* | Rotterdam Wct | ATP 250 | R32 | Carpet | Jaime Fillol | 7-5 0-6 7-6(3) | Chris Lewis | Match data |
| Mar 30, 1978* | Milan Wct | ATP 250 | R32 | Carpet | Jaime Fillol | 5-7 7-6 6-2 | Chris Lewis | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chris Lewis | #1,054 | #19 | 8 | 1,863 | 221 | 196 | 53.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Jaime Fillol | #1,171 | #14 | 8 | 2,041 | 532 | 367 | 59.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 7 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Chris Lewis | Jaime Fillol | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1973 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1974 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #318 | 1,477 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1975 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #396 | 1,460 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1976 | 9–16 | 36.0% | #127 | 1,523 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1977 | 18–12 | 60.0% | #51 | 1,743 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1978 | 34–26 | 56.7% | #40 | 1,773 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1979 | 10–18 | 35.7% | #65 | 1,617 | 0 | 1 | 1968 | 30–10 | 75.0% | — | 1,658 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1980 | 24–24 | 50.0% | #59 | 1,669 | 0 | 1 | 1969 | 27–19 | 58.7% | — | 1,673 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1981 | 41–24 | 63.1% | #31 | 1,829 | 0 | 2 | 1970 | 32–23 | 58.2% | — | 1,749 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1982 | 30–20 | 60.0% | #48 | 1,712 | 0 | 2 | 1971 | 43–21 | 67.2% | — | 1,774 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 1983 | 28–23 | 54.9% | #26 | 1,774 | 0 | 2 | 1972 | 44–32 | 57.9% | — | 1,745 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 1984 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #93 | 1,649 | 0 | 2 | 1973 | 51–33 | 60.7% | #17 | 1,867 | 0 | 4 |
| 28 | 1985 | 11–11 | 50.0% | #120 | 1,595 | 0 | 3 | 1974 | 48–32 | 60.0% | #31 | 1,830 | 0 | 4 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1975 | 56–27 | 67.5% | #16 | 1,962 | 0 | 4 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1976 | 47–27 | 63.5% | #24 | 1,928 | 0 | 5 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1977 | 44–21 | 67.7% | #24 | 1,894 | 0 | 5 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1978 | 33–29 | 53.2% | #77 | 1,756 | 0 | 5 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1979 | 21–28 | 42.9% | #124 | 1,736 | 0 | 5 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 10–22 | 31.2% | #86 | 1,644 | 0 | 5 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 18–19 | 48.6% | #95 | 1,654 | 0 | 6 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 14–8 | 63.6% | #77 | 1,707 | 0 | 7 |
| 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1983 | 14–16 | 46.7% | #85 | 1,649 | 0 | 7 |