H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Chris Lewis vs Kim Warwick H2H: 2-2
Chris Lewis and Kim Warwick are tied 2–2 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Chris Lewis leads 2–1 on grass, while Kim Warwick leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Kim Warwick won the 1980 Gstaad quarterfinal 6-2 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
NZL
Age 69
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
2
–
2
4 main draw meetings
AUS
Age 74
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 12, 1980* | Gstaad | ATP 250 | QF | Clay | Kim Warwick | 6-2 6-3 | Chris Lewis | Match data |
| Dec 10, 1977* | Adelaide | ATP 250 | SF | Grass | Chris Lewis | 7-5 6-4 | Kim Warwick | Match data |
| Jun 8, 1977* | Nottingham | ATP 250 | R64 | Grass | Chris Lewis | 9-8 6-8 10-8 | Kim Warwick | Match data |
| Oct 30, 1974* | Christchurch | ATP 250 | R32 | Grass | Kim Warwick | 3-6 6-1 6-3 | Chris Lewis | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chris Lewis | #1,054 | #19 | 8 | 1,863 | 221 | 196 | 53.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Kim Warwick | #1,294 | #15 | 15 | 1,945 | 290 | 273 | 51.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Chris Lewis | Kim Warwick | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1973 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1974 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #318 | 1,477 | 0 | 0 | 1969 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1975 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #396 | 1,460 | 0 | 0 | 1970 | 6–8 | 42.9% | — | 1,472 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1976 | 9–16 | 36.0% | #127 | 1,523 | 0 | 0 | 1971 | 4–7 | 36.4% | — | 1,467 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1977 | 18–12 | 60.0% | #51 | 1,743 | 0 | 0 | 1972 | 11–9 | 55.0% | — | 1,569 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1978 | 34–26 | 56.7% | #40 | 1,773 | 0 | 1 | 1973 | 11–22 | 33.3% | #108 | 1,559 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1979 | 10–18 | 35.7% | #65 | 1,617 | 0 | 1 | 1974 | 30–23 | 56.6% | #48 | 1,717 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1980 | 24–24 | 50.0% | #59 | 1,669 | 0 | 1 | 1975 | 28–24 | 53.8% | #49 | 1,726 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1981 | 41–24 | 63.1% | #31 | 1,829 | 0 | 2 | 1976 | 28–32 | 46.7% | #67 | 1,746 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1982 | 30–20 | 60.0% | #48 | 1,712 | 0 | 2 | 1977 | 35–29 | 54.7% | #50 | 1,710 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1983 | 28–23 | 54.9% | #26 | 1,774 | 0 | 2 | 1978 | 29–23 | 55.8% | #41 | 1,788 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 1984 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #93 | 1,649 | 0 | 2 | 1979 | 37–27 | 57.8% | #52 | 1,804 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 1985 | 11–11 | 50.0% | #120 | 1,595 | 0 | 3 | 1980 | 39–25 | 60.9% | #36 | 1,926 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #29 | 1,743 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 15–15 | 50.0% | #36 | 1,799 | 0 | 3 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1983 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #99 | 1,688 | 0 | 3 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1984 | 6–5 | 54.5% | #196 | 1,686 | 0 | 3 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #497 | 1,664 | 0 | 3 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #600 | 1,652 | 0 | 3 |