H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Chris Lewis vs Peter Doohan H2H: 2-0
Chris Lewis holds a 2–0 lead over Peter Doohan in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Chris Lewis leads 1–0 on grass and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Chris Lewis won the 1984 Auckland third round 6-3 6-7 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
NZL
Age 69
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
AUS
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 12, 1984* | Auckland | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Chris Lewis | 6-3 6-7 6-1 | Peter Doohan | Match data |
| Dec 23, 1983* | Adelaide | ATP 250 | R16 | Grass | Chris Lewis | 7-6 6-4 | Peter Doohan | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chris Lewis | #1,054 | #19 | 8 | 1,863 | 221 | 196 | 53.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Peter Doohan | #1,102 | #43 | 140 | 1,737 | 50 | 82 | 37.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Chris Lewis | Peter Doohan | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1973 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1974 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #318 | 1,477 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1975 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #396 | 1,460 | 0 | 0 | 1979 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #480 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1976 | 9–16 | 36.0% | #127 | 1,523 | 0 | 0 | 1980 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,493 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1977 | 18–12 | 60.0% | #51 | 1,743 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #549 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1978 | 34–26 | 56.7% | #40 | 1,773 | 0 | 1 | 1982 | 3–3 | 50.0% | — | 1,505 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1979 | 10–18 | 35.7% | #65 | 1,617 | 0 | 1 | 1983 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #363 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1980 | 24–24 | 50.0% | #59 | 1,669 | 0 | 1 | 1984 | 10–9 | 52.6% | #85 | 1,614 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1981 | 41–24 | 63.1% | #31 | 1,829 | 0 | 2 | 1985 | 18–19 | 48.6% | #101 | 1,683 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1982 | 30–20 | 60.0% | #48 | 1,712 | 0 | 2 | 1986 | 0–7 | 0.0% | #301 | 1,555 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1983 | 28–23 | 54.9% | #26 | 1,774 | 0 | 2 | 1987 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #72 | 1,618 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 1984 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #93 | 1,649 | 0 | 2 | 1988 | 4–13 | 23.5% | #187 | 1,485 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 1985 | 11–11 | 50.0% | #120 | 1,595 | 0 | 3 | 1989 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #172 | 1,451 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #331 | 1,435 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1131 | 1,427 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1097 | 1,421 | 0 | 1 |