H2H data updated: 2026-09-02 00:00 UTC

Chris Lewis vs Ross Case H2H: 0-2

Ross Case holds a 2–0 lead over Chris Lewis in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Ross Case leads 1–0 on grass and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Ross Case won the 1979 Canadian Open round of 64 4-6 6-4 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Chris Lewis
NZL Age 69 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
0 – 2
2 main draw meetings
Ross Case
AUS Age 74 Right-Handed

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Ross Case #63 4-6 6-4 6-3 Chris Lewis #51 Match data Aug 15, 1979* R64 Canadian Open ATP 500 Hard
Ross Case #44 3-6 6-1 7-6 6-1 Chris Lewis Match data Jan 5, 1977* R64 Australian Open Grand Slam Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Chris Lewis #1,054 #19 8 1,865 221 196 53.0% 0 0 0 0 3 3
Ross Case #758 #24 0 1,962 293 274 51.7% 0 0 0 0 4 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Chris Lewis Ross Case
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1973 0–1 0.0% — 1,491 0 0 1968 3–3 50.0% — 1,519 0 0
17 1974 1–2 33.3% #318 1,477 0 0 1969 4–4 50.0% — 1,538 0 0
18 1975 0–1 0.0% #396 1,461 0 0 1970 11–8 57.9% — 1,560 0 0
19 1976 9–16 36.0% #127 1,525 0 0 1971 26–20 56.5% — 1,637 0 0
20 1977 18–12 60.0% #55 1,746 0 0 1972 22–21 51.2% — 1,685 0 0
21 1978 34–26 56.7% #40 1,796 0 1 1973 42–34 55.3% #42 1,811 0 1
22 1979 10–18 35.7% #65 1,626 0 1 1974 42–27 60.9% #29 1,820 0 2
23 1980 24–24 50.0% #59 1,679 0 1 1975 38–21 64.4% #27 1,936 0 4
24 1981 41–24 63.1% #31 1,830 0 2 1976 28–24 53.8% #45 1,837 0 4
25 1982 30–20 60.0% #48 1,724 0 2 1977 21–24 46.7% #48 1,749 0 4
26 1983 28–23 54.9% #57 1,776 0 2 1978 14–19 42.4% #86 1,679 0 4
27 1984 15–18 45.5% #93 1,656 0 2 1979 24–26 48.0% #74 1,676 0 4
28 1985 11–11 50.0% #120 1,598 0 3 1980 11–20 35.5% #163 1,621 0 4
29 — — — — — — — 1981 5–15 25.0% — 1,502 0 4
30 — — — — — — — 1982 1–5 16.7% — 1,467 0 4
31 — — — — — — — 1983 1–3 25.0% #415 1,458 0 4

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Chris Lewis Ross Case
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 1973 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1968 — — — — — — — — 3 3 6 50.0% — — — —
17 1974 — — — — — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 1969 — — — — — — — — 4 4 8 50.0% — — — —
18 1975 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1970 0 2 2 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 10 3 13 76.9% — — — —
19 1976 1 3 4 25.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 2 4 6 33.3% 4 4 8 50.0% 1971 10 8 18 55.6% 2 5 7 28.6% 14 7 21 66.7% — — — —
20 1977 — — — — 5 5 10 50.0% 13 7 20 65.0% — — — — 1972 6 7 13 46.2% 0 3 3 0.0% 11 7 18 61.1% 5 4 9 55.6%
21 1978 0 2 2 0.0% 30 16 46 65.2% 2 4 6 33.3% 2 4 6 33.3% 1973 10 5 15 66.7% 17 14 31 54.8% 11 7 18 61.1% 4 8 12 33.3%
22 1979 0 3 3 0.0% 10 13 23 43.5% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 1974 15 13 28 53.6% 8 6 14 57.1% 9 5 14 64.3% 10 3 13 76.9%
23 1980 0 3 3 0.0% 16 10 26 61.5% 4 6 10 40.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 1975 21 8 29 72.4% 8 6 14 57.1% 7 2 9 77.8% 2 5 7 28.6%
24 1981 14 7 21 66.7% 8 6 14 57.1% 13 7 20 65.0% 6 4 10 60.0% 1976 5 6 11 45.5% 5 4 9 55.6% 8 4 12 66.7% 10 10 20 50.0%
25 1982 5 4 9 55.6% 16 9 25 64.0% 9 7 16 56.3% — — — — 1977 8 8 16 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 8 7 15 53.3% 5 8 13 38.5%
26 1983 8 6 14 57.1% 9 8 17 52.9% 10 4 14 71.4% 1 5 6 16.7% 1978 4 6 10 40.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 6 5 11 54.5% 2 6 8 25.0%
27 1984 3 4 7 42.9% 11 10 21 52.4% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1979 4 7 11 36.4% 10 9 19 52.6% 9 5 14 64.3% 1 5 6 16.7%
28 1985 5 1 6 83.3% 3 6 9 33.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1980 2 3 5 40.0% 7 9 16 43.8% 1 4 5 20.0% 1 4 5 20.0%
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1981 1 7 8 12.5% 2 4 6 33.3% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1982 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1983 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
Career — 36 33 69 52.2% 110 88 198 55.6% 58 51 109 53.2% 17 24 41 41.5% — 87 83 170 51.2% 62 66 128 48.4% 103 68 171 60.2% 41 57 98 41.8%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Chris Lewis Ross Case
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 1973 1491 97.1 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — -0.05 1968 1519 97.0 — — — — — — +27 50.0% -0.57 1–1 — — +0.29
17 1974 1478 99.8 — — — — — — +14 42.9% -0.38 1–1 — — +0.45 1969 1538 111.9 — — — — — — +28 40.0% -0.15 2–0 — — +0.09
18 1975 1461 100.3 — — — — — — — 25.0% -1.75 — 0–1 — +0.08 1970 1560 109.1 — — — — — -78 +73 50.0% -0.02 4–2 (67%) 1–1 — +2.54
19 1976 1525 125.9 — — — — +43 +6 +6 42.9% -0.55 2–9 (18%) 5–2 (71%) — +1.53 1971 1638 118.4 — — — — -15 -130 +69 53.8% +0.08 7–3 (70%) 6–9 (40%) — +3.95
20 1977 1746 143.6 — — — — — -125 +1 58.1% +0.59 4–4 (50%) 4–5 (44%) — +0.23 1972 1685 119.5 — — — — +8 -217 +88 53.0% -0.09 6–6 (50%) 7–2 (78%) — +2.54
21 1978 1796 149.1 — — — — -214 +9 -64 58.1% +0.80 6–6 (50%) 3–4 (43%) — +0.28 1973 1811 144.2 — — — — -4 -97 -10 53.1% +0.25 14–8 (64%) 7–15 (32%) — -2.77
22 1979 1626 126.6 — — — — -84 +70 — 39.4% -0.66 3–6 (33%) 3–6 (33%) — +0.17 1974 1820 143.4 — — — — +14 -88 +26 57.1% +0.54 13–8 (62%) 12–9 (57%) — -2.23
23 1980 1679 133.7 — — — — -146 +67 +21 49.1% -0.12 6–4 (60%) 6–8 (43%) — +1.31 1975 1937 143.0 — — — — +8 -189 -46 59.7% +0.58 15–10 (60%) 11–3 (79%) — +0.72
24 1981 1831 147.2 — — — — -63 -49 -7 56.1% +0.43 18–5 (78%) 10–11 (48%) — +0.80 1976 1837 150.4 — — — — +17 -79 +82 54.5% +0.20 7–11 (39%) 13–14 (48%) — -3.31
25 1982 1724 133.3 — — — — +32 +57 +34 62.9% +0.82 4–4 (50%) 11–4 (73%) — +2.19 1977 1750 141.1 — — — — +2 — +96 44.0% -0.15 9–6 (60%) 5–8 (38%) — -3.52
26 1983 1776 139.5 — — — — -75 -1 +127 52.1% +0.13 13–8 (62%) 13–18 (42%) — -0.32 1978 1679 126.3 — — — — -11 +32 +126 46.0% -0.43 7–11 (39%) 6–4 (60%) — +0.45
27 1984 1657 127.2 — — — — +2 +105 +134 42.3% -0.62 7–2 (78%) 5–2 (71%) — -0.18 1979 1676 135.6 — — — — -77 +31 +155 47.7% -0.18 9–8 (53%) 6–10 (38%) — -2.48
28 1985 1598 117.4 — — — — +95 +79 +146 51.6% +0.09 3–4 (43%) 4–3 (57%) — +2.69 1980 1621 128.5 — — — — -49 +77 +125 40.5% -0.63 4–6 (40%) 5–7 (42%) — -0.60
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1981 1503 104.6 — — — — -34 +123 +209 31.4% -1.16 2–5 (29%) 1–4 (20%) — +1.19
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1982 1467 105.7 — — — — +2 — — 25.0% -1.12 1–1 0–2 — +0.37
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1983 1459 103.5 — — — — -6 — — 36.4% -0.82 1–2 (33%) 2–3 (40%) — +0.31
Career — 1865 142.6 — — — — -52 +31 +34 52.4% +0.18 67–53 (56%) 64–64 (50%) 105.0 +2.22 — 1962 139.3 — — — — -4 -53 +70 50.7% +0.02 102–88 (54%) 82–91 (47%) 99.4 -0.44

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.