H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Chris Lewis vs Tarik Benhabiles H2H: 0-1
Tarik Benhabiles holds a 1–0 lead over Chris Lewis in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Tarik Benhabiles leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Tarik Benhabiles won the 1985 Monte Carlo second round 5-7 6-1 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
NZL
Age 69
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
FRA
Age 61
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 3, 1985* | Monte Carlo | ATP 250 | R64 | Clay | Tarik Benhabiles | 5-7 6-1 6-1 | Chris Lewis | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chris Lewis | #1,054 | #19 | 8 | 1,863 | 221 | 196 | 53.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Tarik Benhabiles | #1,262 | #22 | 387 | 1,767 | 69 | 105 | 39.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Chris Lewis | Tarik Benhabiles | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1973 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1974 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #318 | 1,477 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,483 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1975 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #396 | 1,460 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #616 | 1,465 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1976 | 9–16 | 36.0% | #127 | 1,523 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 10–9 | 52.6% | #71 | 1,597 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1977 | 18–12 | 60.0% | #51 | 1,743 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 16–26 | 38.1% | #134 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1978 | 34–26 | 56.7% | #40 | 1,773 | 0 | 1 | 1986 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #46 | 1,609 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1979 | 10–18 | 35.7% | #65 | 1,617 | 0 | 1 | 1987 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #65 | 1,609 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1980 | 24–24 | 50.0% | #59 | 1,669 | 0 | 1 | 1988 | 4–10 | 28.6% | #230 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1981 | 41–24 | 63.1% | #31 | 1,829 | 0 | 2 | 1989 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #113 | 1,599 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1982 | 30–20 | 60.0% | #48 | 1,712 | 0 | 2 | 1990 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #107 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1983 | 28–23 | 54.9% | #26 | 1,774 | 0 | 2 | 1991 | 5–11 | 31.2% | #177 | 1,544 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1984 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #93 | 1,649 | 0 | 2 | 1992 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #378 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1985 | 11–11 | 50.0% | #120 | 1,595 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |