H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Christian Ruud vs Daniel Vacek H2H: 1-1
Christian Ruud and Daniel Vacek are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Christian Ruud leads 1–0 on clay, while Daniel Vacek leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Daniel Vacek won the 1999 Long Island fourth round 6-3 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
NOR
Age 53
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
CZE
Age 55
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 27, 1999* | Long Island | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Daniel Vacek | 6-3 6-3 | Christian Ruud | Match data |
| May 4, 1996* | Prague | ATP 250 | QF | Clay | Christian Ruud | 6-1 6-3 | Daniel Vacek | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Christian Ruud | #662 | #39 | 1,006 | 1,768 | 98 | 128 | 43.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Daniel Vacek | #1,133 | #26 | 1,151 | 1,818 | 170 | 219 | 43.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Christian Ruud | Daniel Vacek | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 1992 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #291 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1993 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #146 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #470 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1994 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #84 | 1,519 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1995 | 15–24 | 38.5% | #75 | 1,583 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 13–22 | 37.1% | #114 | 1,560 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1996 | 22–23 | 48.9% | #59 | 1,657 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 25–27 | 48.1% | #45 | 1,711 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1997 | 23–25 | 47.9% | #65 | 1,620 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 30–31 | 49.2% | #27 | 1,794 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1998 | 2–13 | 13.3% | #86 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 22–28 | 44.0% | #71 | 1,694 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1999 | 22–17 | 56.4% | #67 | 1,650 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 19–26 | 42.2% | #53 | 1,669 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2000 | 8–16 | 33.3% | #144 | 1,585 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 25–29 | 46.3% | #50 | 1,672 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2001 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #290 | 1,610 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 29–31 | 48.3% | #43 | 1,744 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 4–13 | 23.5% | #238 | 1,630 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #393 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #749 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 |