H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Christopher Eubanks vs Peter Gojowczyk H2H: 0-1
Peter Gojowczyk holds a 1–0 lead over Christopher Eubanks in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Peter Gojowczyk leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Peter Gojowczyk won the 2020 Australian Open first round 7-6(1) 6-3 4-6 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
United States
Age 30
Right-Handed
201 cm / 6'7"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
GER
Age 37
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 22, 2020* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Peter Gojowczyk | 7-6(1) 6-3 4-6 6-0 | Christopher Eubanks | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Christopher Eubanks | #420 | #29 | 1,358 | 1,928 | 43 | 67 | 39.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Peter Gojowczyk | #1,284 | #39 | 1,175 | 1,885 | 75 | 97 | 43.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Christopher Eubanks | Peter Gojowczyk | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 2015 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #282 | 1,463 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2016 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #649 | 1,473 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #494 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2017 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #347 | 1,528 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2018 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #170 | 1,477 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #181 | 1,584 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2019 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #228 | 1,535 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #162 | 1,608 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #235 | 1,564 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 7–8 | 46.7% | #79 | 1,697 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2021 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #160 | 1,612 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #194 | 1,652 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2022 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #123 | 1,712 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #189 | 1,678 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2023 | 21–20 | 51.2% | #34 | 1,776 | 0 | 1 | 2017 | 14–9 | 60.9% | #60 | 1,809 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2024 | 10–18 | 35.7% | #107 | 1,684 | 0 | 1 | 2018 | 23–25 | 47.9% | #59 | 1,801 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2025 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #264 | 1,587 | 0 | 1 | 2019 | 10–21 | 32.3% | #117 | 1,671 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #145 | 1,621 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 13–9 | 59.1% | #86 | 1,756 | 0 | 1 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 4–14 | 22.2% | #235 | 1,585 | 0 | 1 |