H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 16:32 UTC
Christopher O'Connell vs Nicolas Jarry H2H: 2-0
Christopher O'Connell holds a 2–0 lead over Nicolas Jarry in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Christopher O'Connell leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Christopher O'Connell won the 2025 Tiriac Open Presented by UniCredit Bank fourth round 6-2 5-7 7-6.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Australia
Age 32
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
Chile
Age 30
Right-Handed
198 cm / 6'6"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 4, 2025* | Tiriac Open Presented by UniCredit Bank | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Christopher O'Connell | 6-2 5-7 7-6 | Nicolas Jarry | Match data |
| Aug 28, 2024* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Christopher O'Connell | 6-4 6-3 4-6 6-3 | Nicolas Jarry | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Christopher O'Connell | #127 | #53 | 930 | 1,820 | 62 | 96 | 39.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Nicolas Jarry | #211 | #16 | 2,295 | 1,942 | 110 | 117 | 48.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Christopher O'Connell | Nicolas Jarry | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #372 | 1,469 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #330 | 1,461 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #111 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 25–21 | 54.3% | #43 | 1,765 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2017 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #393 | 1,524 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 17–19 | 47.2% | #77 | 1,691 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #146 | 1,671 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2020 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #120 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 | 2022 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #152 | 1,697 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2021 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #175 | 1,660 | 0 | 0 | 2023 | 36–19 | 65.5% | #19 | 1,907 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 2022 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #78 | 1,707 | 0 | 0 | 2024 | 16–22 | 42.1% | #35 | 1,737 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 2023 | 19–23 | 45.2% | #68 | 1,719 | 0 | 0 | 2025 | 11–19 | 36.7% | #122 | 1,696 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | 2024 | 17–22 | 43.6% | #64 | 1,742 | 0 | 0 | 2026 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #211 | 1,603 | 0 | 3 |
| 31 | 2025 | 13–20 | 39.4% | #116 | 1,658 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2026 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #127 | 1,606 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |