H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Christopher O'Connell vs Taro Daniel H2H: 1-2
Taro Daniel holds a 2–1 lead over Christopher O'Connell in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Taro Daniel leads 2–0 on clay, while Christopher O'Connell leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Taro Daniel won the 2024 Munich third round 6-3 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Australia
Age 32
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
Japan
Age 33
Right-Handed
191 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 25, 2024 | Tokyo | ATP 500 | Q2 | Hard | Christopher O'Connell | 6-3 7-5 | Taro Daniel | Match data |
| Apr 18, 2024* | Munich | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Taro Daniel | 6-3 6-4 | Christopher O'Connell | Match data |
| Sep 24, 2023* | Chengdu | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Christopher O'Connell | 7-6(10) 6-4 | Taro Daniel | Match data |
| May 30, 2023* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Taro Daniel | 6-0 6-2 6-4 | Christopher O'Connell | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Christopher O'Connell | #127 | #53 | 930 | 1,820 | 62 | 96 | 39.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Taro Daniel | #194 | #58 | 893 | 1,815 | 81 | 146 | 35.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Christopher O'Connell | Taro Daniel | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #177 | 1,645 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #96 | 1,705 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2017 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #393 | 1,524 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #127 | 1,670 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #99 | 1,641 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 16–17 | 48.5% | #77 | 1,710 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2020 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #120 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 11–18 | 37.9% | #110 | 1,655 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2021 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #175 | 1,660 | 0 | 0 | 2020 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #117 | 1,595 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2022 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #78 | 1,707 | 0 | 0 | 2021 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #125 | 1,613 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2023 | 19–23 | 45.2% | #68 | 1,719 | 0 | 0 | 2022 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #92 | 1,691 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 2024 | 17–22 | 43.6% | #64 | 1,742 | 0 | 0 | 2023 | 11–16 | 40.7% | #75 | 1,687 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | 2025 | 13–20 | 39.4% | #116 | 1,658 | 0 | 0 | 2024 | 10–23 | 30.3% | #84 | 1,631 | 0 | 1 |
| 32 | 2026 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #127 | 1,606 | 0 | 0 | 2025 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #376 | 1,503 | 0 | 1 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #194 | 1,521 | 0 | 1 |