H2H data updated: 2026-07-17 14:15 UTC
Cristian Garin vs Aljaz Bedene H2H: 0-1
Aljaz Bedene holds a 1–0 lead over Cristian Garin in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Aljaz Bedene leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Aljaz Bedene won the 2020 Cincinnati Masters second round 6-4 6-7(8) 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Chile
Age 30
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
SLO
Age 36
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 24, 2020 | Cincinnati Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Hard | Aljaz Bedene | 6-4 6-7(8) 6-0 | Cristian Garin | Match data |
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cristian Garin | #141 | #17 | 2,610 | 1,948 | 121 | 113 | 51.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 5 |
| Aljaz Bedene | #1,030 | #43 | 1,169 | 1,893 | 130 | 159 | 45.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Cristian Garin | Aljaz Bedene | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2013 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #388 | 1,517 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2014 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #252 | 1,570 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2016 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #211 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2017 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #311 | 1,610 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #165 | 1,597 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2018 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #84 | 1,604 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #86 | 1,627 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2019 | 30–22 | 57.7% | #33 | 1,800 | 0 | 2 | 2013 | 10–17 | 37.0% | #95 | 1,625 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2020 | 18–9 | 66.7% | #22 | 1,861 | 0 | 4 | 2014 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #145 | 1,669 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2021 | 21–17 | 55.3% | #17 | 1,820 | 0 | 5 | 2015 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #45 | 1,775 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2022 | 17–21 | 44.7% | #85 | 1,802 | 0 | 5 | 2016 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #101 | 1,740 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2023 | 19–16 | 54.3% | #82 | 1,799 | 0 | 5 | 2017 | 19–18 | 51.4% | #49 | 1,816 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2024 | 8–9 | 47.1% | #152 | 1,688 | 0 | 5 | 2018 | 17–19 | 47.2% | #67 | 1,732 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2025 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #79 | 1,599 | 0 | 5 | 2019 | 18–18 | 50.0% | #58 | 1,838 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2026 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #141 | 1,591 | 0 | 5 | 2020 | 10–12 | 45.5% | #58 | 1,796 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 15–15 | 50.0% | #109 | 1,773 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #347 | 1,658 | 0 | 0 |