H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Cyril Saulnier vs Davide Sanguinetti H2H: 2-0
Cyril Saulnier holds a 2–0 lead over Davide Sanguinetti in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Cyril Saulnier leads 2–0 on carpet. Most recently, Cyril Saulnier won the 2002 Moscow third round 6-4 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 50
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
ITA
Age 53
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 3, 2002* | Moscow | ATP 250 | R32 | Carpet | Cyril Saulnier | 6-4 6-1 | Davide Sanguinetti | Match data |
| Feb 1, 2001* | Milan | ATP 250 | R32 | Carpet | Cyril Saulnier | 7-6(6) 6-4 | Davide Sanguinetti | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cyril Saulnier | #1,013 | #48 | 798 | 1,800 | 75 | 111 | 40.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Davide Sanguinetti | #1,080 | #42 | 874 | 1,771 | 157 | 233 | 40.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Cyril Saulnier | Davide Sanguinetti | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #177 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #290 | 1,455 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1999 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #167 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2000 | 4–14 | 22.2% | #130 | 1,562 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 5–11 | 31.2% | #95 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2001 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #137 | 1,540 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 29–27 | 51.8% | #48 | 1,675 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2002 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #158 | 1,565 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 8–23 | 25.8% | #120 | 1,560 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2003 | 14–15 | 48.3% | #86 | 1,712 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 17–21 | 44.7% | #65 | 1,639 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2004 | 28–23 | 54.9% | #53 | 1,777 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 10–27 | 27.0% | #91 | 1,528 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2005 | 16–26 | 38.1% | #90 | 1,643 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 22–21 | 51.2% | #46 | 1,620 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | 2006 | 4–10 | 28.6% | #242 | 1,573 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 16–21 | 43.2% | #65 | 1,620 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | 2007 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #670 | 1,622 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 11–20 | 35.5% | #110 | 1,588 | 0 | 2 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 25–25 | 50.0% | #44 | 1,710 | 0 | 2 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 9–24 | 27.3% | #107 | 1,547 | 0 | 2 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #270 | 1,519 | 0 | 2 |