H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 13:16 UTC
Damir Dzumhur vs Cedrik-Marcel Stebe H2H: 1-1
Damir Dzumhur and Cedrik-Marcel Stebe are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Cedrik-Marcel Stebe leads 1–0 on clay, while Damir Dzumhur leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Damir Dzumhur won the 2017 US Open second round 4-6 6-4 6-0 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Bosnia-Herzegovina
Age 34
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
Germany
Age 35
Left-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 31, 2017* | US Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Damir Dzumhur | 4-6 6-4 6-0 6-1 | Cedrik-Marcel Stebe | Match data |
| Jul 27, 2017* | Hamburg | ATP 500 | R32 | Clay | Cedrik-Marcel Stebe | 6-3 6-4 | Damir Dzumhur | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Damir Dzumhur | #108 | #23 | 1,665 | 1,951 | 136 | 171 | 44.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Cedrik-Marcel Stebe | #366 | #71 | 688 | 1,756 | 29 | 49 | 37.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Damir Dzumhur | Cedrik-Marcel Stebe | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #81 | 1,656 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #177 | 1,649 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2014 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #109 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #167 | 1,654 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2015 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #82 | 1,665 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2016 | 20–21 | 48.8% | #77 | 1,752 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2017 | 34–23 | 59.6% | #30 | 1,933 | 0 | 2 | 2016 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #470 | 1,618 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2018 | 24–30 | 44.4% | #47 | 1,778 | 0 | 3 | 2017 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #82 | 1,725 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2019 | 13–21 | 38.2% | #93 | 1,741 | 0 | 3 | 2018 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #507 | 1,684 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2020 | 0–8 | 0.0% | #119 | 1,712 | 0 | 3 | 2019 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #165 | 1,715 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2021 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #158 | 1,603 | 0 | 3 | 2020 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #126 | 1,679 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2022 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #186 | 1,598 | 0 | 3 | 2021 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #227 | 1,553 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2023 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #154 | 1,532 | 0 | 3 | 2022 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #203 | 1,557 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | 2024 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #83 | 1,453 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2025 | 18–26 | 40.9% | #66 | 1,672 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2026 | 11–15 | 42.3% | #108 | 1,676 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |