H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Damir Dzumhur vs David Goffin H2H: 0-2
David Goffin holds a 2–0 lead over Damir Dzumhur in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, David Goffin leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, David Goffin won the 2022 Marrakech third round 6-2 7-6(3).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Bosnia-Herzegovina
Age 34
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
Belgium
Age 35
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 7, 2022* | Marrakech | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | David Goffin | 6-2 7-6(3) | Damir Dzumhur | Match data |
| Jan 21, 2016* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | David Goffin | 6-4 0-6 6-4 6-2 | Damir Dzumhur | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Damir Dzumhur | #108 | #23 | 1,665 | 1,951 | 136 | 171 | 44.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| David Goffin | #251 | #7 | 3,775 | 2,099 | 325 | 264 | 55.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 6 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Damir Dzumhur | David Goffin | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #174 | 1,591 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 14–13 | 51.9% | #46 | 1,789 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2014 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #109 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 10–21 | 32.3% | #110 | 1,749 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2015 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #82 | 1,665 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 22–14 | 61.1% | #22 | 1,970 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 2016 | 20–21 | 48.8% | #77 | 1,752 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 34–24 | 58.6% | #16 | 1,984 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 2017 | 34–23 | 59.6% | #30 | 1,933 | 0 | 2 | 2016 | 44–24 | 64.7% | #11 | 2,020 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 2018 | 24–30 | 44.4% | #47 | 1,778 | 0 | 3 | 2017 | 53–24 | 68.8% | #7 | 2,061 | 0 | 4 |
| 27 | 2019 | 13–21 | 38.2% | #93 | 1,741 | 0 | 3 | 2018 | 27–16 | 62.8% | #22 | 2,024 | 0 | 4 |
| 28 | 2020 | 0–8 | 0.0% | #119 | 1,712 | 0 | 3 | 2019 | 36–26 | 58.1% | #11 | 1,986 | 0 | 4 |
| 29 | 2021 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #158 | 1,603 | 0 | 3 | 2020 | 9–10 | 47.4% | #15 | 1,862 | 0 | 4 |
| 30 | 2022 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #186 | 1,598 | 0 | 3 | 2021 | 14–15 | 48.3% | #39 | 1,745 | 0 | 5 |
| 31 | 2023 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #154 | 1,532 | 0 | 3 | 2022 | 23–25 | 47.9% | #53 | 1,759 | 0 | 6 |
| 32 | 2024 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #83 | 1,453 | 0 | 3 | 2023 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #111 | 1,710 | 0 | 6 |
| 33 | 2025 | 18–26 | 40.9% | #66 | 1,672 | 0 | 3 | 2024 | 17–16 | 51.5% | #52 | 1,825 | 0 | 6 |
| 34 | 2026 | 11–15 | 42.3% | #108 | 1,676 | 0 | 3 | 2025 | 11–22 | 33.3% | #119 | 1,695 | 0 | 6 |