H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Damir Dzumhur vs Illya Marchenko H2H: 1-1
Damir Dzumhur and Illya Marchenko are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Damir Dzumhur leads 1–0 on clay, while Illya Marchenko leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Illya Marchenko won the 2016 US Open second round 6-2 6-4 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Bosnia-Herzegovina
Age 34
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
Ukraine
Age 38
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 1, 2016* | US Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Illya Marchenko | 6-2 6-4 6-3 | Damir Dzumhur | Match data |
| Apr 29, 2016* | Istanbul | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Damir Dzumhur | 6-3 5-7 6-3 | Illya Marchenko | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Damir Dzumhur | #108 | #23 | 1,665 | 1,951 | 136 | 171 | 44.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Illya Marchenko | #1,347 | #49 | 905 | 1,805 | 50 | 82 | 37.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Damir Dzumhur | Illya Marchenko | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #120 | 1,638 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2014 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #109 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 17–21 | 44.7% | #81 | 1,710 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2015 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #82 | 1,665 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #229 | 1,554 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2016 | 20–21 | 48.8% | #77 | 1,752 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #140 | 1,565 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2017 | 34–23 | 59.6% | #30 | 1,933 | 0 | 2 | 2013 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #165 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2018 | 24–30 | 44.4% | #47 | 1,778 | 0 | 3 | 2014 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #143 | 1,645 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2019 | 13–21 | 38.2% | #93 | 1,741 | 0 | 3 | 2015 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #94 | 1,738 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2020 | 0–8 | 0.0% | #119 | 1,712 | 0 | 3 | 2016 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #74 | 1,705 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2021 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #158 | 1,603 | 0 | 3 | 2017 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #196 | 1,655 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2022 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #186 | 1,598 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2023 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #154 | 1,532 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2024 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #83 | 1,453 | 0 | 3 | 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #215 | 1,544 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | 2025 | 18–26 | 40.9% | #66 | 1,672 | 0 | 3 | 2021 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #163 | 1,636 | 0 | 0 |
| 34 | 2026 | 11–15 | 42.3% | #108 | 1,676 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #220 | 1,568 | 0 | 0 |