H2H data updated: 2026-09-02 00:00 UTC

Damir Dzumhur vs Lukas Lacko H2H: 1-0

Damir Dzumhur holds a 1–0 lead over Lukas Lacko in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Damir Dzumhur leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Damir Dzumhur won the 2017 Shenzhen round of 16 6-4 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Damir Dzumhur
Bosnia-Herzegovina Age 34 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main draw meetings
Lukas Lacko
SVK Age 38 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Damir Dzumhur #40 6-4 6-3 Lukas Lacko #118 Match data Sep 29, 2017* R16 Shenzhen ATP 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Damir Dzumhur #104 #23 1,665 1,951 136 175 43.7% 0 0 0 0 3 3
Lukas Lacko #1,505 #44 917 1,838 81 135 37.5% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Damir Dzumhur Lukas Lacko
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 — — — — — — — 2007 0–2 0.0% #139 1,499 0 0
20 — — — — — — — 2008 0–1 0.0% #325 1,480 0 0
21 — — — — — — — 2009 1–3 25.0% #82 1,607 0 0
22 2014 2–4 33.3% #109 1,597 0 0 2010 16–21 43.2% #89 1,669 0 0
23 2015 7–9 43.8% #82 1,667 0 0 2011 4–7 36.4% #112 1,670 0 0
24 2016 20–22 47.6% #77 1,741 0 0 2012 12–19 38.7% #51 1,644 0 0
25 2017 34–23 59.6% #30 1,932 0 2 2013 11–16 40.7% #81 1,667 0 0
26 2018 24–30 44.4% #47 1,778 0 3 2014 11–17 39.3% #94 1,733 0 0
27 2019 13–21 38.2% #93 1,741 0 3 2015 2–12 14.3% #110 1,647 0 0
28 2020 0–8 0.0% #119 1,711 0 3 2016 4–7 36.4% #122 1,682 0 0
29 2021 3–5 37.5% #158 1,603 0 3 2017 7–10 41.2% #92 1,740 0 0
30 2022 2–4 33.3% #186 1,598 0 3 2018 11–16 40.7% #114 1,677 0 0
31 2023 2–2 50.0% #154 1,533 0 3 2019 1–3 25.0% #183 1,579 0 0
32 2024 0–3 0.0% #83 1,454 0 3 — — — — — — —
33 2025 18–26 40.9% #66 1,673 0 3 2021 1–1 50.0% #190 1,497 0 0
34 2026 11–18 37.9% #104 1,634 0 3 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Damir Dzumhur Lukas Lacko
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3%
22 2014 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2010 12 14 26 46.2% 1 4 5 20.0% 3 3 6 50.0%
23 2015 1 3 4 25.0% 6 5 11 54.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 2011 4 6 10 40.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
24 2016 11 14 25 44.0% 7 6 13 53.8% 2 2 4 50.0% 2012 9 12 21 42.9% 0 4 4 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0%
25 2017 31 15 46 67.4% 2 7 9 22.2% 1 1 2 50.0% 2013 11 13 24 45.8% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
26 2018 15 20 35 42.9% 4 8 12 33.3% 5 2 7 71.4% 2014 9 13 22 40.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0%
27 2019 8 15 23 34.8% 3 4 7 42.9% 2 2 4 50.0% 2015 1 8 9 11.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
28 2020 0 8 8 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2016 1 3 4 25.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0%
29 2021 1 3 4 25.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2017 6 7 13 46.2% — — — — 1 3 4 25.0%
30 2022 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2018 6 13 19 31.6% — — — — 5 3 8 62.5%
31 2023 0 1 1 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 2019 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — —
32 2024 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2025 4 12 16 25.0% 14 11 25 56.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 2021 — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
34 2026 2 7 9 22.2% 9 9 18 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 77 107 184 41.8% 49 55 104 47.1% 10 13 23 43.5% — 60 95 155 38.7% 2 14 16 12.5% 19 26 45 42.2%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 306/311 of Damir Dzumhur's and 215/216 of Lukas Lacko's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Damir Dzumhur Lukas Lacko
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
19 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2007 2/2 3.0 3.0 58.5% 59.7% 48.3% 32.1% 8.3% 55.0% 22.6%
20 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2008 1/1 8.0 7.0 54.5% 70.9% 47.0% 64.7% 28.6% 60.0% 31.1%
21 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2009 4/4 5.5 2.0 64.4% 71.7% 48.3% 67.5% 21.5% 63.4% 24.6%
22 2014 6/6 3.0 3.8 56.6% 64.9% 47.8% 41.9% 44.3% 56.8% 36.4% 2010 37/37 6.7 2.6 58.6% 72.6% 50.4% 55.4% 41.7% 63.4% 36.0%
23 2015 16/16 2.6 1.9 66.0% 66.8% 48.6% 43.8% 43.4% 60.9% 40.8% 2011 11/11 6.2 3.4 57.9% 66.4% 48.8% 61.5% 49.0% 59.2% 32.9%
24 2016 41/42 2.6 2.2 66.4% 63.3% 50.8% 52.9% 49.9% 59.1% 39.0% 2012 30/31 6.3 2.0 60.2% 68.3% 49.2% 50.9% 38.9% 60.9% 34.2%
25 2017 57/57 2.7 3.3 63.5% 66.5% 51.3% 53.5% 51.3% 60.9% 40.3% 2013 27/27 5.7 2.8 57.8% 68.4% 48.1% 53.4% 37.5% 59.7% 35.6%
26 2018 53/54 2.6 2.7 63.9% 64.4% 48.1% 51.5% 44.8% 58.3% 38.2% 2014 28/28 4.9 2.6 57.9% 72.2% 50.4% 46.3% 46.3% 63.1% 33.4%
27 2019 33/34 2.3 2.9 62.5% 63.5% 47.2% 57.2% 34.8% 57.3% 36.9% 2015 14/14 7.6 2.4 60.6% 66.1% 48.3% 52.4% 18.2% 59.5% 28.3%
28 2020 8/8 2.5 3.8 62.2% 63.6% 43.5% 44.3% 20.7% 55.9% 34.6% 2016 11/11 5.7 3.3 56.9% 69.7% 49.9% 52.4% 53.8% 60.8% 31.2%
29 2021 8/8 1.1 2.1 70.4% 68.6% 46.4% 53.0% 47.8% 62.2% 34.7% 2017 17/17 7.2 2.2 57.4% 74.0% 56.2% 58.3% 35.3% 65.9% 33.4%
30 2022 6/6 2.8 2.3 62.0% 63.5% 49.7% 37.8% 35.8% 58.2% 38.1% 2018 27/27 8.0 3.1 57.1% 74.5% 51.2% 48.5% 37.5% 64.4% 34.5%
31 2023 4/4 0.5 1.0 73.6% 62.2% 51.4% 48.2% 39.2% 59.2% 42.5% 2019 4/4 5.3 2.3 61.2% 71.4% 49.5% 68.5% 8.3% 62.5% 28.2%
32 2024 3/3 0.7 2.7 61.1% 65.6% 42.1% 32.8% 54.2% 56.4% 35.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 2025 42/44 1.3 2.7 66.7% 61.2% 53.4% 58.4% 44.2% 58.6% 38.4% 2021 2/2 4.0 1.5 62.4% 71.8% 63.0% 62.5% 16.7% 68.7% 32.3%
34 2026 29/29 1.3 1.8 65.7% 59.8% 48.8% 52.1% 39.3% 56.1% 38.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 306/311 2.2 2.6 64.7% 63.9% 49.6% 52.4% 44.2% 58.8% 38.5% — 215/216 6.4 2.6 58.5% 70.7% 50.3% 53.0% 38.2% 62.2% 33.5%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Damir Dzumhur Lukas Lacko
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 1483 98.6 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2011 1491 100.0 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1499 101.9 +1.81 -2.71 0.502 39.5% — — — 16.7% -2.67 — — — +0.02
20 2012 1475 99.5 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 1480 94.2 -0.69 -1.07 0.779 46.8% — — — 25.0% -2.00 — 1–1 — +0.29
21 2013 1506 107.3 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 1607 112.9 -1.36 -0.52 0.671 46.0% — — +49 30.0% -0.80 0–1 2–2 (50%) — -0.10
22 2014 1597 118.6 -1.97 +0.53 0.844 46.4% +24 — — 26.7% -1.53 — 0–1 — -0.26 2010 1670 135.5 +0.10 -0.24 0.982 49.4% -21 -170 -17 45.5% -0.57 6–12 (33%) 15–6 (71%) — -0.83
23 2015 1667 129.2 -2.01 +2.48 1.044 50.4% -76 +55 — 37.8% -0.92 1–2 (33%) 1–1 — -0.15 2011 1670 132.6 -1.32 -1.02 0.806 46.9% +1 — — 37.5% -0.75 3–3 (50%) 4–5 (44%) — -0.54
24 2016 1741 141.7 -3.80 +2.00 0.953 49.1% -42 +24 -114 45.2% -0.23 14–8 (64%) 5–11 (31%) — +0.12 2012 1644 139.6 -1.32 -1.68 0.874 47.5% +20 -213 +119 38.6% -0.76 6–3 (67%) 5–8 (38%) — -0.47
25 2017 1932 152.7 -2.31 +3.45 1.030 50.6% +22 -261 — 56.4% +0.30 14–11 (56%) 9–7 (56%) — +1.00 2013 1668 139.8 -2.67 -1.18 0.882 47.9% +30 — — 45.6% -0.69 3–5 (38%) 5–2 (71%) — -0.64
26 2018 1778 145.4 -4.17 +1.68 0.917 48.5% 0 -105 -44 49.2% -0.24 6–9 (40%) 11–8 (58%) — +1.03 2014 1734 137.9 -0.40 -1.90 0.904 48.4% +3 — -21 39.4% -0.62 2–3 (40%) 3–6 (33%) — -0.19
27 2019 1742 136.2 -4.69 +0.59 0.864 47.0% -6 -58 -36 37.7% -0.83 7–1 (88%) 3–8 (27%) — -0.33 2015 1648 120.8 -3.25 -3.69 0.699 44.0% -38 — +63 26.2% -1.62 2–4 (33%) 3–4 (43%) — -0.16
28 2020 1711 130.3 -1.94 -0.73 0.785 45.1% -16 — — 18.2% -2.18 0–3 (0%) 2–1 (67%) — -0.82 2016 1682 124.0 -2.47 -1.63 0.798 46.8% -124 — +133 38.5% -0.69 1–0 2–3 (40%) — +0.21
29 2021 1603 116.6 -0.78 +0.35 0.919 48.4% +23 +54 — 42.1% -1.05 0–2 3–1 (75%) — -0.42 2017 1740 131.9 +1.11 -2.04 0.978 49.7% -14 — +51 40.5% -0.36 1–1 2–4 (33%) — +0.17
30 2022 1599 116.6 -2.01 -1.57 0.912 48.1% +21 — — 33.3% -0.80 1–1 1–1 — +0.11 2018 1678 127.0 -0.16 -1.20 0.969 49.4% -91 — +171 43.3% -0.25 3–4 (43%) 4–6 (40%) — +1.00
31 2023 1534 109.2 -1.08 +1.46 1.041 50.4% — +87 — 44.4% -0.22 1–0 1–1 — -0.50 2019 1579 109.6 -3.16 -1.14 0.753 46.3% -3 — — 25.0% -1.63 — — — +0.11
32 2024 1454 107.4 -3.25 -2.67 0.803 45.8% +18 — — 14.3% -1.43 0–1 0–1 — -0.02 2020 1514 93.5 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2025 1673 137.4 -3.88 +1.08 0.927 48.5% -76 +61 -53 42.7% -0.44 9–9 (50%) 6–8 (43%) — +0.97 2021 1497 101.4 +0.23 -1.99 1.032 50.8% — — — 40.0% +0.40 1–0 0–2 — +0.09
34 2026 1634 120.8 -5.44 +1.07 0.869 47.3% -66 +45 — 40.3% -0.81 5–3 (63%) 8–4 (67%) — +1.27 2022 1445 93.3 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1952 138.9 -3.52 +1.61 0.934 48.6% -11 -3 -59 44.4% -0.43 58–50 (54%) 50–53 (49%) 105.0 +0.65 — 1838 133.0 -0.96 -1.44 0.886 48.0% -14 -189 +77 39.8% -0.70 28–36 (44%) 46–49 (48%) 97.9 -0.48

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.