H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 19:16 UTC
Damir Dzumhur vs Mischa Zverev H2H: 0-1
Mischa Zverev holds a 1–0 lead over Damir Dzumhur in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Mischa Zverev leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Mischa Zverev won the 2018 Cincinnati Masters second round 6-3 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Bosnia-Herzegovina
Age 34
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
GER
Age 38
Left-Handed
191 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 14, 2018* | Cincinnati Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Hard | Mischa Zverev | 6-3 6-4 | Damir Dzumhur | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Damir Dzumhur | #108 | #23 | 1,665 | 1,951 | 136 | 172 | 44.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Mischa Zverev | #1,373 | #25 | 1,664 | 2,007 | 134 | 199 | 40.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Damir Dzumhur | Mischa Zverev | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #151 | 1,528 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #88 | 1,606 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 18–23 | 43.9% | #80 | 1,703 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 15–24 | 38.5% | #78 | 1,630 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2014 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #109 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 14–18 | 43.8% | #82 | 1,689 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2015 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #82 | 1,665 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 2–18 | 10.0% | #211 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2016 | 20–21 | 48.8% | #77 | 1,752 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #159 | 1,608 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2017 | 34–23 | 59.6% | #30 | 1,933 | 0 | 2 | 2013 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #176 | 1,639 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2018 | 24–30 | 44.4% | #47 | 1,778 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2019 | 13–21 | 38.2% | #93 | 1,741 | 0 | 3 | 2015 | 7–8 | 46.7% | #171 | 1,839 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2020 | 0–8 | 0.0% | #119 | 1,712 | 0 | 3 | 2016 | 12–14 | 46.2% | #51 | 1,917 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2021 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #158 | 1,603 | 0 | 3 | 2017 | 30–31 | 49.2% | #33 | 1,850 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2022 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #186 | 1,598 | 0 | 3 | 2018 | 19–29 | 39.6% | #69 | 1,686 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | 2023 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #154 | 1,532 | 0 | 3 | 2019 | 3–12 | 20.0% | #281 | 1,571 | 0 | 1 |
| 32 | 2024 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #83 | 1,453 | 0 | 3 | 2020 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #264 | 1,568 | 0 | 1 |
| 33 | 2025 | 18–26 | 40.9% | #66 | 1,672 | 0 | 3 | 2021 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #346 | 1,521 | 0 | 1 |
| 34 | 2026 | 11–15 | 42.3% | #108 | 1,664 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |