H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 01:16 UTC
Damir Dzumhur vs Pablo Cuevas H2H: 1-1
Damir Dzumhur and Pablo Cuevas are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Pablo Cuevas leads 1–0 on grass, while Damir Dzumhur leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Pablo Cuevas won the 2019 Wimbledon first round 4-6 7-6(8) 2-6 6-4 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Bosnia-Herzegovina
Age 34
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
URU
Age 40
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 3, 2019* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Pablo Cuevas | 4-6 7-6(8) 2-6 6-4 6-2 | Damir Dzumhur | Match data |
| Aug 30, 2017* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Damir Dzumhur | 7-5 7-6(3) 6-1 | Pablo Cuevas | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Damir Dzumhur | #108 | #23 | 1,665 | 1,951 | 136 | 172 | 44.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Pablo Cuevas | #841 | #19 | 1,865 | 1,960 | 211 | 212 | 49.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Damir Dzumhur | Pablo Cuevas | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #113 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2014 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #109 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #142 | 1,631 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2015 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #82 | 1,665 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 18–15 | 54.5% | #50 | 1,744 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2016 | 20–21 | 48.8% | #77 | 1,752 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 20–22 | 47.6% | #63 | 1,760 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2017 | 34–23 | 59.6% | #30 | 1,933 | 0 | 2 | 2011 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #142 | 1,743 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2018 | 24–30 | 44.4% | #47 | 1,778 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2019 | 13–21 | 38.2% | #93 | 1,741 | 0 | 3 | 2013 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #220 | 1,718 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2020 | 0–8 | 0.0% | #119 | 1,712 | 0 | 3 | 2014 | 17–12 | 58.6% | #30 | 1,842 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 2021 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #158 | 1,603 | 0 | 3 | 2015 | 28–25 | 52.8% | #40 | 1,815 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | 2022 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #186 | 1,598 | 0 | 3 | 2016 | 33–22 | 60.0% | #22 | 1,818 | 0 | 5 |
| 31 | 2023 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #154 | 1,532 | 0 | 3 | 2017 | 20–21 | 48.8% | #32 | 1,788 | 0 | 6 |
| 32 | 2024 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #83 | 1,453 | 0 | 3 | 2018 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #88 | 1,766 | 0 | 6 |
| 33 | 2025 | 18–26 | 40.9% | #66 | 1,672 | 0 | 3 | 2019 | 22–23 | 48.9% | #45 | 1,740 | 0 | 6 |
| 34 | 2026 | 11–16 | 40.7% | #108 | 1,664 | 0 | 3 | 2020 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #67 | 1,691 | 0 | 6 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #97 | 1,651 | 0 | 6 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #269 | 1,654 | 0 | 6 |